Shareholding Or Common Directors Don’t Automatically Make Companies Related Persons Unless Mutuality Of Interest In Business Is Established: CESTAT

HomeIndirect TaxesShareholding Or Common Directors Don’t Automatically Make Companies Related Persons Unless Mutuality...

Shareholding Or Common Directors Don’t Automatically Make Companies Related Persons Unless Mutuality Of Interest In Business Is Established: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

17/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Chandigarh Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the department failed to establish that the company and its buyers were “related persons” or “inter-connected undertakings” under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The bench of S. S. Garg (Judicial Member) and P. Anjani Kumar (Technical Member)…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Shareholding Or Common Directors Don’t Automatically Make Companies Related Persons Unless Mutuality Of Interest In Business Is Established: CESTAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

TDS Credit Can’t Be Restrict Due to Mismatch Between Form 26AS and ITR While Processing Return: ITAT

Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked for SAD Demand on FTWZ–DTA Stock Transfers: CESTAT

Meerut DGGI | Court Denies Bail to Transporter Accused of Moving Areca Nuts Worth Rs. 5,000 Crore Without E-Way Bills

MPID Act Overrides Income Tax, PMLA Claims: Bombay High Court Upholds Release of Seized Rs. 60 Crore for Investor Repayment

More like this

TDS Credit Can’t Be Restrict Due to Mismatch Between Form 26AS and ITR While Processing Return: ITAT

Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked for SAD Demand on FTWZ–DTA Stock Transfers: CESTAT

Meerut DGGI | Court Denies Bail to Transporter Accused of Moving Areca Nuts Worth Rs. 5,000 Crore Without E-Way Bills

About us

Company

Categories