Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesService Tax For Transfer Of Development Rights? GST Dept. Directed To File...

Service Tax For Transfer Of Development Rights? GST Dept. Directed To File Appeal Before Supreme Court Against CESTAT Order: Delhi High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has directed the GST Department to file the appeal against the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) order on service tax for transfer of development rights before the Supreme Court.

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta while dismissing GST Department’s appeal relied on the decision of Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Delhi South v. M/s Spicejet Ltd. in which it was held that an appeal against the CESTAT order would lie, in terms of Section 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944, to the Supreme Court.

The appellant/department has raised the issue whether the transfer of development rights is liable for service tax. The Order had held that the service would not be taxable. 

The Department had challenged the same by way of an appeal before the CESTAT, which has been rejected on the ground of limitation.

The respondent/assessee raised the question of maintainability of the present appeal in view of Section 35G and 35L of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which applies in respect of service tax cases as well.

The court held that the appeal would not be maintainable before this Court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with liberty to the Appellant to approach the Supreme Court.

Case Details

Case Title: The Commissioner Cgst Delhi South Commissionerate Versus M/S Haamid Real Estate Pvt Ltd.

Case No.: SERTA 4/2025

Date: 05/05/2025

Counsel For Appellant: Atul Tripathi

Counsel For Respondent: Puneet Agrawal

Read More: Hawala Transactions : ED Seizes Rs6.30 Crores In Torres Jewellery Case

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

Missing Seized Records Must Be Considered While Testing ITC Claim; Duplicate GST Demands Ordered Corrected: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the tax department’s inability to furnish seized...

Capital Addition Can’t Be Taxed on Assumptions in Reassessment: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹2.73 crore addition made...

GST Appeal Can’t Be Rejected Without Addressing Taxpayer’s Grounds: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has set aside an appellate order concerning cancellation of GST...

More like this

No Mini-Trial at Cognizance Stage: Directors’ Claim of Cooperation Must Be Examined During Trial

The Karnataka High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against two individuals facing...

Missing Seized Records Must Be Considered While Testing ITC Claim; Duplicate GST Demands Ordered Corrected: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has held that the tax department’s inability to furnish seized...

Capital Addition Can’t Be Taxed on Assumptions in Reassessment: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court has upheld the deletion of a ₹2.73 crore addition made...