The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that payments made to a Protection and Indemnity (P&I) club for mutual insurance cover cannot be treated as taxable services under the reverse charge mechanism due to the doctrine of mutuality. The Bench of Ajayan T.V. (Judicial Member) and M….
Ask Jurishour AI
No Service Tax On Payments Made To Protection And Indemnity Club For Mutual Insurance Cover: CESTAT
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.
Latest articles
Supreme Court
Mere Physical Access to Plot No Ground to Deny Zero Period Benefit When Promised Front Road Was Unavailable: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has held that a development authority cannot deny the benefit of...
Supreme Court
‘Excepted Matters’ Question Falls Within Arbitral Tribunal’s Jurisdiction U/S 16: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has held that the question whether a contractual claim falls within...
Supreme Court
Personal Guarantor Bound By Arbitration Clause When Guarantee Forms Integral Part Of Loan Agreement: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has held that an arbitration clause contained in a loan agreement...
Supreme Court
Promotion Followed by Compulsory Retirement Is “Mutually Destructive”: Supreme Court Awards ₹15 Lakh to Former Trade Service Officer
The Supreme Court has set aside the compulsory retirement of a former Indian Trade...
More like this
Supreme Court
Mere Physical Access to Plot No Ground to Deny Zero Period Benefit When Promised Front Road Was Unavailable: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has held that a development authority cannot deny the benefit of...
Supreme Court
‘Excepted Matters’ Question Falls Within Arbitral Tribunal’s Jurisdiction U/S 16: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has held that the question whether a contractual claim falls within...
Supreme Court
Personal Guarantor Bound By Arbitration Clause When Guarantee Forms Integral Part Of Loan Agreement: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has held that an arbitration clause contained in a loan agreement...

