Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesService Tax Not Payable on Freight Margin and Commissions: CESTAT 

Service Tax Not Payable on Freight Margin and Commissions: CESTAT 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore, has ruled that service tax is not leviable on profit margins earned on freight and commissions received from shipping lines. The Tribunal set aside a demand of over Rs. 6.59 lakh along with interest and penalties, providing clarity on a long-disputed issue for the logistics industry.

The bench of Dr. D.M. Misra (Judicial Member) and Mr. A.K. Jyotishi (Technical Member) has examined whether the charges fell under “Cargo Handling Services” or “Business Auxiliary Services.” Relying on earlier rulings, including its own decisions in 2018 and 2024 in similar matters, the Tribunal noted the activities involved monitoring and managing the consolidation/deconsolidation of consignments, not physical handling of cargo, and hence could not be taxed as cargo handling services. Commissions and incentives received from shipping lines were already held to be outside the scope of taxable services under Business Auxiliary Services, citing the precedent of Bax Global India Ltd. v. CST Chennai (2017).

The dispute arose after tax authorities alleged that certain charges collected from importers — including freight, currency adjustment fees, and delivery order/courier charges — amounted to taxable income. The department argued that the difference between freight collected from customers in India and the amount remitted abroad should be treated as a taxable margin under service tax law.

An adjudication order confirmed the demand, which was upheld by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals). This prompted the affected logistics operator to approach CESTAT.

The Tribunal concluded that the service tax liability on freight margins and commissions “cannot survive,” striking down the demand and related penalties.

Case Details

Case Title: M/s. Flyjac Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise

Case No.: Service Tax Appeal No. 28332 of 2013

Date: Service Tax Appeal No. 28332 of 2013

Counsel For  Petitioner:  Radhika Shivaranjini, Advocate 

Counsel For Respondent:  Vinod Kumar Garhwal, Superintendent (AR) 

Read More: CESTAT Bangalore Grants Relief to Dell India, Allows Refund of Service Tax Paid on SEZ Operations

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Demand on Money Transfer Services: Delhi High Court Sends Export and S. 74 Disputes to Appellate Authority

The Delhi High Court has directed the assessee to pursue its statutory appeal against...

GST Refund Rejection Quashed After Revised Notice Returned Undelivered: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has set aside the rejection of a ₹3.83 lakh GST...

Customs Can’t Insist on Form-I for India–UK CETA Tariff Claims Supported by Valid Origin Declaration: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that an importer...

Can Foreign Assets Be Assessed for AY 2018–19 When the First Black Money Act Notice Was Issued in FY 2018–19? Karnataka High Court Says...

The Karnataka High Court has quashed an assessment concerning two properties in Morocco after...

More like this

GST Demand on Money Transfer Services: Delhi High Court Sends Export and S. 74 Disputes to Appellate Authority

The Delhi High Court has directed the assessee to pursue its statutory appeal against...

GST Refund Rejection Quashed After Revised Notice Returned Undelivered: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has set aside the rejection of a ₹3.83 lakh GST...

Customs Can’t Insist on Form-I for India–UK CETA Tariff Claims Supported by Valid Origin Declaration: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that an importer...