Rs. 347 Crore Service Tax Demand on Mining Royalties Against Rajasthan Govt. Mines and Geology Dept. Quashed: CESTAT

HomeIndirect TaxesRs. 347 Crore Service Tax Demand on Mining Royalties Against Rajasthan Govt....

Rs. 347 Crore Service Tax Demand on Mining Royalties Against Rajasthan Govt. Mines and Geology Dept. Quashed: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

24/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Rs. 347 Crore Service Tax Demand on Mining Royalties Against Rajasthan Govt. Mines and Geology Dept. Quashed: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has set aside a service tax demand of over ₹347 crore raised against the Department of Mines and Geology, Rajasthan, holding that royalty and dead rent collected for granting mining rights do not constitute taxable services under the category of “renting of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Service Tax Demand

Rs. 347 Crore Service Tax Demand on Mining Royalties Against Rajasthan Govt. Mines and Geology Dept. Quashed: CESTAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

Daughters’ Partition Suit Can’t Be Rejected at Threshold; S. 6(5) of Hindu Succession Act Is Only a Saving Clause, Not a Bar: Supreme Court

India’s Gold Demand May Fall 10% in 2026 After Sharp Duty Hike

Can S. 122(1A) Be Invoked Against Individual Not Retaining Benefit of Transaction? Bombay HC Stays Recovery of Penalty on Director

Whether ‘3 Months’ U/s 73(10) of CGST Act Means Exactly 3 Calendar Months or 90 Days? SC Issues Notice

More like this

Daughters’ Partition Suit Can’t Be Rejected at Threshold; S. 6(5) of Hindu Succession Act Is Only a Saving Clause, Not a Bar: Supreme Court

India’s Gold Demand May Fall 10% in 2026 After Sharp Duty Hike

Can S. 122(1A) Be Invoked Against Individual Not Retaining Benefit of Transaction? Bombay HC Stays Recovery of Penalty on Director

About us

Company

Categories