Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesRule 26 Of Central Excise Rules, Can’t Apply Without Confiscation: CESTAT Cancels...

Rule 26 Of Central Excise Rules, Can’t Apply Without Confiscation: CESTAT Cancels Penalty in Rebate Case

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Rule 26 Of of Central Excise Rules, Can’t Apply Without Confiscation: CESTAT Cancels Penalty in Rebate Case

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad, has set aside a personal penalty of Rs. 45 lakh imposed on an individual employee accused of involvement in an alleged fraudulent rebate scheme dating back to 2003–04 and held that the penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was legally unsustainable,…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Importer Alleges Backdated DIN In Arrest Documents: Mumbai Court Grants Bail In ₹31.86 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to an importer accused of evading approximately ₹31.86...
GST

Dept. Can’t Challenge Fine Alone While Leaving Related Penalty Findings Uncontested: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Agra State Bench, has summarily dismissed...
GST

GST On Mining Royalty: Gujarat High Court Bars Final Orders Without Its Permission, Allows Adjudication To Continue

The Gujarat High Court has granted ad-interim protection in a batch of petitions challenging...
Columns

FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 – SRI SUJIT DAS AND ORS. ETC. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA

This Article pertaining to FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 - SRI SUJIT DAS...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Importer Alleges Backdated DIN In Arrest Documents: Mumbai Court Grants Bail In ₹31.86 Crore Customs Duty Evasion Case

A Mumbai court has granted bail to an importer accused of evading approximately ₹31.86...
GST

Dept. Can’t Challenge Fine Alone While Leaving Related Penalty Findings Uncontested: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Agra State Bench, has summarily dismissed...
GST

GST On Mining Royalty: Gujarat High Court Bars Final Orders Without Its Permission, Allows Adjudication To Continue

The Gujarat High Court has granted ad-interim protection in a batch of petitions challenging...