Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesRs.1.42 Crores Excise Duty Against Zarda Factory: Delhi High Court Dismisses Dept....

Rs.1.42 Crores Excise Duty Against Zarda Factory: Delhi High Court Dismisses Dept. Appeal Citing Low Tax Effect

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has dismissed the department’s appeal demanding Rs.1.42 Crores Excise Duty from a Zarda Factory named Prabhat Zarda Factory citing low tax effect.

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta has observed that the duty demanded is about Rs.1.42 Crores which is less than the prescribed monetary limit of two crores for filing an appeal before the High Court in terms of Instruction F.No.390/Misc./163/2010-JC dated 17th August, 2011 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.

The department filed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 challenging the Final passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (CESTAT).

The court held that the appeal would not be liable to be entertained.

Case Details

Case Title: Principal Commissioner Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi North Versus Prabhat Zarda Factory (Co.)

Case No.: CEAC 27/2019&CM APPL. 47936/2019

Date: 27.02.2025

Counsel For Appellant: Harpreet Singh – Senior Standing Counsel

Counsel For Respondent: Avinash Trivedi

Read More: INCOME TAX APPEALS | CIT(A) Corrects Action Of CPC By Allowing S. 87A Rebate On Special Rate Incomes

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

One-Year Limitation U/s 11B Of Central Excise Act Not Applicable to Refund of Cess Paid by Mistake: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has held that the one-year limitation prescribed under Section 11B...

Plea Seeking Mandatory Disclosure of Exact Ethanol Content in Petrol: Supreme Court Declines To Entertain

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to entertain a petition seeking mandatory disclosure of...

GOLD JEWELLERY KEPT AT HOME LIMIT | Diamond-Studded Jewellery Covered by CBDT’s Permissible Limit: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition of approximately Rs. 3.86...

Penalty On CHA’s Employee Who Attempted Export Of Prohibited Red Sanders Quashed: Calcutta High Court 

The Calcutta High Court has set aside a penalty of ₹5 lakh imposed on...

More like this

One-Year Limitation U/s 11B Of Central Excise Act Not Applicable to Refund of Cess Paid by Mistake: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has held that the one-year limitation prescribed under Section 11B...

Plea Seeking Mandatory Disclosure of Exact Ethanol Content in Petrol: Supreme Court Declines To Entertain

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to entertain a petition seeking mandatory disclosure of...

GOLD JEWELLERY KEPT AT HOME LIMIT | Diamond-Studded Jewellery Covered by CBDT’s Permissible Limit: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition of approximately Rs. 3.86...