HomeIndirect TaxesRs.1.42 Crores Excise Duty Against Zarda Factory: Delhi High Court Dismisses Dept....

Rs.1.42 Crores Excise Duty Against Zarda Factory: Delhi High Court Dismisses Dept. Appeal Citing Low Tax Effect

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has dismissed the department’s appeal demanding Rs.1.42 Crores Excise Duty from a Zarda Factory named Prabhat Zarda Factory citing low tax effect.

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta has observed that the duty demanded is about Rs.1.42 Crores which is less than the prescribed monetary limit of two crores for filing an appeal before the High Court in terms of Instruction F.No.390/Misc./163/2010-JC dated 17th August, 2011 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.

The department filed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 challenging the Final passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (CESTAT).

The court held that the appeal would not be liable to be entertained.

Case Details

Case Title: Principal Commissioner Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi North Versus Prabhat Zarda Factory (Co.)

Case No.: CEAC 27/2019&CM APPL. 47936/2019

Date: 27.02.2025

Counsel For Appellant: Harpreet Singh – Senior Standing Counsel

Counsel For Respondent: Avinash Trivedi

Read More: INCOME TAX APPEALS | CIT(A) Corrects Action Of CPC By Allowing S. 87A Rebate On Special Rate Incomes

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court Ruling Revives Scrutiny of Pre-2016 Benami Transactions; Retrospective Confiscation Powers Upheld

The Supreme Court has reignited nationwide scrutiny of old benami transactions by holding that...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 10 May, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for May 10, 2026.GSTSERVICES TO FOREIGN UNIVERSITIES NOT...

Madras HC Waives Requirement Of 10% Pre Deposit Of Penalty And Allow Appeals To Be Filed Without Pre-Deposit

The Madras High Court has waived requirement of 10% pre-deposit of penalty and allow...

DRI Complaint Before Special Court Not Governed By Private Complaint Procedure: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has upheld the conviction and 10-year rigorous imprisonment sentence imposed...

More like this

Supreme Court Ruling Revives Scrutiny of Pre-2016 Benami Transactions; Retrospective Confiscation Powers Upheld

The Supreme Court has reignited nationwide scrutiny of old benami transactions by holding that...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 10 May, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for May 10, 2026.GSTSERVICES TO FOREIGN UNIVERSITIES NOT...

Madras HC Waives Requirement Of 10% Pre Deposit Of Penalty And Allow Appeals To Be Filed Without Pre-Deposit

The Madras High Court has waived requirement of 10% pre-deposit of penalty and allow...