HomeIndirect TaxesRs.1.42 Crores Excise Duty Against Zarda Factory: Delhi High Court Dismisses Dept....

Rs.1.42 Crores Excise Duty Against Zarda Factory: Delhi High Court Dismisses Dept. Appeal Citing Low Tax Effect

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has dismissed the department’s appeal demanding Rs.1.42 Crores Excise Duty from a Zarda Factory named Prabhat Zarda Factory citing low tax effect.

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta has observed that the duty demanded is about Rs.1.42 Crores which is less than the prescribed monetary limit of two crores for filing an appeal before the High Court in terms of Instruction F.No.390/Misc./163/2010-JC dated 17th August, 2011 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.

The department filed the appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 challenging the Final passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (CESTAT).

The court held that the appeal would not be liable to be entertained.

Case Details

Case Title: Principal Commissioner Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi North Versus Prabhat Zarda Factory (Co.)

Case No.: CEAC 27/2019&CM APPL. 47936/2019

Date: 27.02.2025

Counsel For Appellant: Harpreet Singh – Senior Standing Counsel

Counsel For Respondent: Avinash Trivedi

Read More: INCOME TAX APPEALS | CIT(A) Corrects Action Of CPC By Allowing S. 87A Rebate On Special Rate Incomes

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Vendor Non-Response Alone Can’t Justify Denial of Business Expenditure: ITAT Remands Rs. 40.63 Crore Expense Disallowance

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the...

CBDT Circular Denying Tax Relief to Judges Under New Tax Regime Questioned: Delhi HC Stays Processing of Judges’ ITRs

The Delhi High Court has prima facie held that statutory allowances granted to High...

Forex Hedging Gains on Cancellation of Forward Contracts Are Capital Gains, Not ‘Income From Other Sources’: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that gains...

No Motor Accident Compensation Without Proven Link Between Death and Use of Vehicle: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act cannot be...

More like this

Vendor Non-Response Alone Can’t Justify Denial of Business Expenditure: ITAT Remands Rs. 40.63 Crore Expense Disallowance

The Chennai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the...

CBDT Circular Denying Tax Relief to Judges Under New Tax Regime Questioned: Delhi HC Stays Processing of Judges’ ITRs

The Delhi High Court has prima facie held that statutory allowances granted to High...

Forex Hedging Gains on Cancellation of Forward Contracts Are Capital Gains, Not ‘Income From Other Sources’: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that gains...