Requirement Of Pre-Deposit For Preferring An Appeal Can’t Be Onerous Or Burdensome: Calcutta High Court

HomeIndirect TaxesRequirement Of Pre-Deposit For Preferring An Appeal Can’t Be Onerous Or Burdensome:...

Requirement Of Pre-Deposit For Preferring An Appeal Can’t Be Onerous Or Burdensome: Calcutta High Court

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

12/11/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Requirement Of Pre-Deposit For Preferring An Appeal Can’t Be Onerous Or Burdensome: Calcutta High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court has held that the requirement of pre-deposit for the purpose of preferring an appeal cannot be said to be onerous or burdensome. The Bench of Justice Debangsu Basak and Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi has refused to grant relief to a petitioner seeking waiver of the statutory pre-deposit required for filing an…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
pre-deposit

Requirement Of Pre-Deposit For Preferring An Appeal Can’t Be Onerous Or Burdensome: Calcutta High Court

Membership Required

Latest articles

Maintenance to Qualified Wife Denied: Allahabad High Court [READ ORDER]

Delay Must Be Examined Considering Wrong Service of Order: CESTAT Remands BHEL’s Excise Refund Appeal

Patna High Court Upholds GST Summons in Fake ITC Probe; Dismisses Writ Challenging Multiple Notices, Imposes Rs. 25K Cost

Mere Deposit in Electronic Ledger Not GST Payment: Andhra Pradesh HC Quashes Composite Order

More like this

Maintenance to Qualified Wife Denied: Allahabad High Court [READ ORDER]

Delay Must Be Examined Considering Wrong Service of Order: CESTAT Remands BHEL’s Excise Refund Appeal

Patna High Court Upholds GST Summons in Fake ITC Probe; Dismisses Writ Challenging Multiple Notices, Imposes Rs. 25K Cost

About us

Company

Categories