Rejection of Reassessment and Bill of Entry Substitution: CESTAT Denies Retrospective Benefit of Cotton Import Duty Exemption

HomeIndirect TaxesRejection of Reassessment and Bill of Entry Substitution: CESTAT Denies Retrospective Benefit...

Rejection of Reassessment and Bill of Entry Substitution: CESTAT Denies Retrospective Benefit of Cotton Import Duty Exemption

Indirect Taxes

Published on

27/03/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Rejection of Reassessment and Bill of Entry Substitution: CESTAT Denies Retrospective Benefit of Cotton Import Duty Exemption

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) while denying retrospective benefit of cotton import duty exemption has held that exemption under a subsequently issued customs notification cannot be claimed retrospectively when it was not in force on the date of filing of Bills of Entry. The bench of Binu Tamta…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
bill of entry

Rejection of Reassessment and Bill of Entry Substitution: CESTAT Denies Retrospective Benefit of Cotton Import Duty Exemption

Membership Required

Latest articles

Farmers Can Claim Protection for Use of Protected Seeds U/S 39(1)(iv): Supreme Court

Civil Money Disputes Can’t Be Used as Recovery Tool: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings

Pre-2007 Indivisible ATM Turnkey Contracts Can’t Be Vivisected for Service Tax: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of CISF Officer, Says Entire Service Record Can Be Considered

More like this

Farmers Can Claim Protection for Use of Protected Seeds U/S 39(1)(iv): Supreme Court

Civil Money Disputes Can’t Be Used as Recovery Tool: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings

Pre-2007 Indivisible ATM Turnkey Contracts Can’t Be Vivisected for Service Tax: Supreme Court

About us

Company

Categories