HomeIndirect TaxesPunjab & Haryana High Court Issues Notice, Grants Interim Protection in Petition...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Issues Notice, Grants Interim Protection in Petition Challenging Entry Tax Assessments

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has issued a notice of motion and granted interim protection in a writ petition filed by Sanden Vikas India Pvt. Ltd. challenging assessment notices under long-repealed entry tax laws.

The bench of Justice Lisa Gill and Justice Alok Jain has granted the interim relief and directed that no adverse action would be taken against the petitioner until the next hearing date.

Sandeep Chilana, Advocate for the petitioner argued that the State’s power to legislate on entry tax is invalid following the removal of Entry 52 of List II of the VIIth Schedule of the Constitution of India, which occurred via a notification dated 16.09.2016. 

The petitioner further contends that no “Removal of Difficulty” order could be issued for a repealed provision. Additionally, it is argued that the impugned action is illegal and arbitrary, even under the erstwhile Haryana Tax on Entry of Goods in the Local Area 2008, which provided a limitation period of three years from the end of the relevant financial year.

Additional Advocate General, Haryana, appearing on advance notice, accepted the notice on behalf of all respondents and sought time to file a reply. 

On interim relief, the government assured the court that no adverse action would be taken against the petitioner until the next hearing date, effectively granting interim protection to the petitioner.

The court listed the matter on 19.05.2025.

Case Details

Case Title:  Sanden Vikas India Pvt. Ltd. Versus UOI

Case No.: CWP 8560/2025

Date: 26/03/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Sandeep Chilana

Counsel For Respondent: Sharan Sethi

Read More: Smuggling Attempt Thwarted by Air Customs at Trivandrum, Calicut, and Cochin Airports: 2.1 Kg of Gold Seized

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Conviction for Kidnapping to Murder Can’t Be Ordered Without Charge: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the acquittal of a man accused in a murder...

Penal Rent for Retaining Staff Quarters Can Be Adjusted Against Gratuity: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a public sector employer can adjust penal rent...

Functional Disability Must Reflect Actual Loss of Earning Capacity, Not Just Medical Percentage: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that functional disability for compensation purposes must reflect the...

FIS Without Satisfying “Make Available” Condition Is Not Taxable Under India-US Tax Treaty: ITAT 

The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that Fees for...

More like this

Conviction for Kidnapping to Murder Can’t Be Ordered Without Charge: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld the acquittal of a man accused in a murder...

Penal Rent for Retaining Staff Quarters Can Be Adjusted Against Gratuity: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a public sector employer can adjust penal rent...

Functional Disability Must Reflect Actual Loss of Earning Capacity, Not Just Medical Percentage: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that functional disability for compensation purposes must reflect the...