Whether Whey Protein with Over 80% Protein Content Falls Under Tariff Heading 3502 or 2106? Delhi HC Directs CAAR to Reconsider

HomeIndirect TaxesWhether Whey Protein with Over 80% Protein Content Falls Under Tariff Heading...

Whether Whey Protein with Over 80% Protein Content Falls Under Tariff Heading 3502 or 2106? Delhi HC Directs CAAR to Reconsider

Indirect Taxes

Published on

09/03/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has directed the Customs Authority for Advance Ruling (CAAR) to reconsider the tariff classification of whey protein products containing more than 80% protein content, after concerns were raised about a possible misclassification under the Customs Tariff Act. The bench of Justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Justice Ajay Digpaul directed the Customs…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Whether Whey Protein with Over 80% Protein Content Falls Under Tariff Heading 3502 or 2106? Delhi HC Directs CAAR to Reconsider

Membership Required

Latest articles

Supplier’s Subsequent Cancellation Alone Can’t Justify Credit Reversal: Madras High Court Quashes GST ITC Demand

ITAT Clubs 26 Black Money Act Appeals for Joint Hearing to Settle Common Jurisdictional Issues

Calcutta High Court Stays GST Demand After Finding Jurisdictional Conflict, S. 73/74 Mismatch in SCN

Calcutta High Court Directs GSTAT to Conclude Anti-Profiteering Proceedings by August 31 After DGAP Finds No Profiteering

More like this

Supplier’s Subsequent Cancellation Alone Can’t Justify Credit Reversal: Madras High Court Quashes GST ITC Demand

ITAT Clubs 26 Black Money Act Appeals for Joint Hearing to Settle Common Jurisdictional Issues

Calcutta High Court Stays GST Demand After Finding Jurisdictional Conflict, S. 73/74 Mismatch in SCN

About us

Company

Categories