Whether Whey Protein with Over 80% Protein Content Falls Under Tariff Heading 3502 or 2106? Delhi HC Directs CAAR to Reconsider

HomeIndirect TaxesWhether Whey Protein with Over 80% Protein Content Falls Under Tariff Heading...

Whether Whey Protein with Over 80% Protein Content Falls Under Tariff Heading 3502 or 2106? Delhi HC Directs CAAR to Reconsider

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

09/03/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has directed the Customs Authority for Advance Ruling (CAAR) to reconsider the tariff classification of whey protein products containing more than 80% protein content, after concerns were raised about a possible misclassification under the Customs Tariff Act. The bench of Justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Justice Ajay Digpaul directed the Customs…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Whether Whey Protein with Over 80% Protein Content Falls Under Tariff Heading 3502 or 2106? Delhi HC Directs CAAR to Reconsider

Membership Required

Latest articles

Hardline Approach Toward Small Importers “Counter-Productive”: Bombay High Court Quashes Order After Seized Goods Deteriorate

Former Additional Director Can’t Be Held Liable for Company’s Later Violations: Karnataka HC Quashes DGFT Order

Madras High Court Allows Fresh GST Adjudication on 10% Pre-Deposit, Orders Lifting of Bank Attachment

Absconding Proposed Detenue Can’t Challenge COFEPOSA Detention at Pre-Execution Stage: Delhi HC

More like this

Hardline Approach Toward Small Importers “Counter-Productive”: Bombay High Court Quashes Order After Seized Goods Deteriorate

Former Additional Director Can’t Be Held Liable for Company’s Later Violations: Karnataka HC Quashes DGFT Order

Madras High Court Allows Fresh GST Adjudication on 10% Pre-Deposit, Orders Lifting of Bank Attachment

About us

Company

Categories