Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesDept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It...

Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside a central excise duty demand, interest, and penalties imposed on Rajasthan-based tobacco manufacturer holding that the department could not alter the classification of the product after consistently treating it as “chewing tobacco” for several years. The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No Mandatory Rs.75K Or Rs. 1.50 Lakh Late Fee on Delayed Tax Audit Report for FY 2025-26

Taxpayers filing their Tax Audit Reports for Financial Year 2025-26 after the prescribed deadline...

GST Proceedings Against Dead Proprietor Invalid: Gujarat High Court Quashes Rs. 28.49 Lakh Demand

The Gujarat High Court has quashed GST show cause notices and a consequential demand...

CGST Demand Prima Facie Impermissible After State GST Settlement U/S 128A: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has prima facie held that the Central GST authorities cannot...

BookMyShow Convenience Fee Is Not Commission; No TDS Liability U/S 194H: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the...

More like this

No Mandatory Rs.75K Or Rs. 1.50 Lakh Late Fee on Delayed Tax Audit Report for FY 2025-26

Taxpayers filing their Tax Audit Reports for Financial Year 2025-26 after the prescribed deadline...

GST Proceedings Against Dead Proprietor Invalid: Gujarat High Court Quashes Rs. 28.49 Lakh Demand

The Gujarat High Court has quashed GST show cause notices and a consequential demand...

CGST Demand Prima Facie Impermissible After State GST Settlement U/S 128A: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has prima facie held that the Central GST authorities cannot...