Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesPerson Dealing In Smuggled Gold Released On Bail: Delhi High Court

Person Dealing In Smuggled Gold Released On Bail: Delhi High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has granted the bail to the person accused of dealing in smuggled gold of the value of about Rs.85 Lakhs and there was evasion of Customs Duty of Rs.35 Lakhs.

The bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna has observed that in view of recovery of 3 kg of gold, the Metropolitan Magistrate has rightly observed that it comes under the category of bailable offence and has rightly granted bail to the Respondents.

There are specific allegations against the Respondent/accused who had dealt with and seized gold weighing 3000 gms appraised to Rs.85,28,745. In four visits, he had also dealt with smuggled gold collectively weighing 8000 gms valuing Rs.2.27 crore.

The department submitted that the accused were also dealing with smuggled gold of 8000 gms valuing Rs.2.27 crores. It is a case of possession / dealing with 11 kg of smuggled gold having foreign making valued at Rs.3,12,28,745. Therefore, the Order granting Bail to the Respondents deserves to be set aside.

The court held that the Metropolitan Magistrate has considered the facts and has granted Bail. It is only incidentally mentioned that the offence disclosed is ‘bailable’, whereas the Bail has been granted considering the entire facts of the present case. The Bail was granted and no circumstance has been brought fourth for reconsideration of the bail.

Case Details

Case Title: Air Customs Versus Sandeep & Ors.

Case No.: CRL.M.C. 3283/2018 & Crl.M.A. 11883/2018 & Crl.M.A. 11885/2018

Date: 14.05.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Satish Aggarwala, Senior Standing Counsel 

Counsel For Respondent: Deepak Nagar, Advocates

Read More: GST Exemption On House Keeping Services To Govt. Educational Institutions? Delhi HC Directs Dept To Determine Pre-Deposit 

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Investors Not Named in Trust Deed: Supreme Court Rejects CBDT Appeal Against Tax Relief 

The Supreme Court has dismissed the Central Board of Direct Taxes’ (CBDT) challenge to...

India’s $112 Billion Trade Gap With China Exposes Manufacturing Dependence

India’s success in reducing toy imports has shown how targeted customs duties and quality...

Disputed GST Hearing Notice Must Be Examined in Appeal; Writ Relief Declined Despite Gaps in 100% Penalty Order: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has declined to interfere with an ex parte GST adjudication...

GST Notice Limitation: Supreme Court Issues Notice On How 3 Month Period Must Be Calculated

The Supreme Court has issued notice on a petition challenging a Gauhati High Court...

More like this

Investors Not Named in Trust Deed: Supreme Court Rejects CBDT Appeal Against Tax Relief 

The Supreme Court has dismissed the Central Board of Direct Taxes’ (CBDT) challenge to...

India’s $112 Billion Trade Gap With China Exposes Manufacturing Dependence

India’s success in reducing toy imports has shown how targeted customs duties and quality...

Disputed GST Hearing Notice Must Be Examined in Appeal; Writ Relief Declined Despite Gaps in 100% Penalty Order: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has declined to interfere with an ex parte GST adjudication...