Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesAmounts Appropriated During Pendency Of Appeal—Despite Existence Of Stay Order—Must Be Treated...

Amounts Appropriated During Pendency Of Appeal—Despite Existence Of Stay Order—Must Be Treated As Payments Made ‘Under Protest’, Refund Not Subjected To Limitation: Madras HC

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Madras HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has held that amounts appropriated by the department during the pendency of an appeal—despite the existence of a stay order—must be treated as payments made “under protest,” and therefore, refund claims in such cases are not subject to the limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The bench…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Steel Import QCO Exemption Can’t Be Denied For SIMS Registration After Shipment Cut-Off Date: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has held that an importer cannot be denied exemption from...
GST

GST Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed Over Pre-Deposit Shortfall Without Opportunity To Respond: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has set aside an order dismissing a cotton trader’s GST...
GST

GST ITC Dispute: Dept. Asked To Produce Supplier’s Returns Or Explain Basis For Alleging Non-Payment Of Tax: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Prayagraj, has directed...
GST

GST Interest Refund Disputes Involving Identical Legal Issue To Be Heard Together By Principal Bench: GSTAT

The Principal Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has allowed...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Steel Import QCO Exemption Can’t Be Denied For SIMS Registration After Shipment Cut-Off Date: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has held that an importer cannot be denied exemption from...
GST

GST Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed Over Pre-Deposit Shortfall Without Opportunity To Respond: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has set aside an order dismissing a cotton trader’s GST...
GST

GST ITC Dispute: Dept. Asked To Produce Supplier’s Returns Or Explain Basis For Alleging Non-Payment Of Tax: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Prayagraj, has directed...