CESTAT Quashes Penalty Over Lack of Proof of ‘Knowledge’ Under Rule 26 in Pan Masala Case

HomeIndirect TaxesCESTAT Quashes Penalty Over Lack of Proof of ‘Knowledge’ Under Rule 26...

CESTAT Quashes Penalty Over Lack of Proof of ‘Knowledge’ Under Rule 26 in Pan Masala Case

Indirect Taxes

Published on

07/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi quashes the penalty over lack of proof of ‘knowledge’ under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules in pan masala case. The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta (President) and P.V. Subba Rao (Member Technical) has emphasized that Rule 26 requires strict fulfillment…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

CESTAT Quashes Penalty Over Lack of Proof of ‘Knowledge’ Under Rule 26 in Pan Masala Case

Membership Required

Latest articles

Criminal Case Against Widow Can’t Automatically Block Son’s Compassionate Appointment: Supreme Court

Falling Tree Branch Not Motor Accident, Yet Victim Awarded ₹25 Lakh Compensation: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Protects Child Victim from Repeated Psychological Evaluation; Sets Aside Bombay High Court’s Multi-Expert Panel Order

Fresh SCN Mandatory Before Punishment if Misconduct is Proved Through De Novo Proceedings After Defective Inquiry: Supreme Court

More like this

Criminal Case Against Widow Can’t Automatically Block Son’s Compassionate Appointment: Supreme Court

Falling Tree Branch Not Motor Accident, Yet Victim Awarded ₹25 Lakh Compensation: Supreme Court

Supreme Court Protects Child Victim from Repeated Psychological Evaluation; Sets Aside Bombay High Court’s Multi-Expert Panel Order

About us

Company

Categories