Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesDept. Can’t Compel Assessee To Pay 10% Value Of Exempted Goods Under...

Dept. Can’t Compel Assessee To Pay 10% Value Of Exempted Goods Under R. 6(3) Of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Dept. Can’t Compel Assessee To Pay 10% Value Of Exempted Goods Under R. 6(3) Of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside an excise duty demand exceeding Rs. 1.21 crore, holding that the extended period of limitation was wrongly invoked and that the Revenue cannot compel an assessee to pay 10% of the value of exempted goods under Rule 6(3) of the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

Expired E-Way Bill Caused by Wrong PIN Code Can’t Justify GST Penalty Without Intent to Evade Tax: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has set aside a penalty...
GST

Absence of 13 Tax Commissionerates in Reliance Jio Transfer Proceedings: GSTAT Directs Notice to CBIC Chairman

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has directed its Registry to inform...
GST

GST Anti-Profiteering Order Requiring  Housing Developer To Pass On Rs. 2.31 Crore To Homebuyers, Along With 18% Interest Upheld: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has upheld a GST anti-profiteering order requiring a housing developer...
GST

GST Waiver Application Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Missing DRC-03A If Tax Was Already Paid: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has set aside an order rejecting a taxpayer’s application for...

More like this

GST

Expired E-Way Bill Caused by Wrong PIN Code Can’t Justify GST Penalty Without Intent to Evade Tax: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has set aside a penalty...
GST

Absence of 13 Tax Commissionerates in Reliance Jio Transfer Proceedings: GSTAT Directs Notice to CBIC Chairman

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has directed its Registry to inform...
GST

GST Anti-Profiteering Order Requiring  Housing Developer To Pass On Rs. 2.31 Crore To Homebuyers, Along With 18% Interest Upheld: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has upheld a GST anti-profiteering order requiring a housing developer...