Dept. Can’t Compel Assessee To Pay 10% Value Of Exempted Goods Under R. 6(3) Of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004: CESTAT

HomeIndirect TaxesDept. Can’t Compel Assessee To Pay 10% Value Of Exempted Goods Under...

Dept. Can’t Compel Assessee To Pay 10% Value Of Exempted Goods Under R. 6(3) Of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

15/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Dept. Can’t Compel Assessee To Pay 10% Value Of Exempted Goods Under R. 6(3) Of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside an excise duty demand exceeding Rs. 1.21 crore, holding that the extended period of limitation was wrongly invoked and that the Revenue cannot compel an assessee to pay 10% of the value of exempted goods under Rule 6(3) of the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Dept. Can’t Compel Assessee To Pay 10% Value Of Exempted Goods Under R. 6(3) Of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004: CESTAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

2G Spectrum | Supreme Court Clarifies Start Date for Reserve Price Liability Post-2G Licence Cancellation

Pre-Natal Sex Determination | Sting Operation Ordered By Single Member Of District Appropriate Authority Is Unsustainable: Supreme Court

Insurer Not Liable for Penalty U/s 4A(3)(b) of Employees’ Compensation Act: Supreme Court

RoDTEP Rates Slashed to 50% with Immediate Effect: DGFT Issues Notification Limiting Benefits Across All HS Lines

More like this

2G Spectrum | Supreme Court Clarifies Start Date for Reserve Price Liability Post-2G Licence Cancellation

Pre-Natal Sex Determination | Sting Operation Ordered By Single Member Of District Appropriate Authority Is Unsustainable: Supreme Court

Insurer Not Liable for Penalty U/s 4A(3)(b) of Employees’ Compensation Act: Supreme Court

About us

Company

Categories