HomeIndirect TaxesOrissa High Court Quashes Increased Tax Demand Against Coca Cola 

Orissa High Court Quashes Increased Tax Demand Against Coca Cola 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Orissa High Court has quashed the increased tax demand against Coca Cola.

The bench of Justice Arindam Sinha and Justice M.S. Sahoo has observed that an amendment, which has the effect of enhancing an assessment or otherwise increasing liability of the assessee shall not be made unless the authority has given notice to the assessee of its intention to do so and has allowed the assessee a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

The bench added that if there has been an increase in the amount of interest by the rectification, petitioner was entitled to a notice for being heard. The concept of aggregate demand remaining the same is not supported by the provision.

The petitioner/assessee, Hindustan Coca Cola has challenged intimation intimating that the Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax (Appeal), in its appeal had dismissed the appeal. The petitioner then became liable to pay tax and interest within 15 days of receipt, failing which recovery proceeding will be initiated. 

The assessee stated that the appeal order was never communicated. 

The department contended that the order is one of rectification made to order. It having been disclosed in the writ petition is demonstration that petitioner was communicated the rectification order, subject matter of the intimation.

The mention of appeal order gives no.3623 and date 21st October, 2023. It carries error inasmuch as the rectification of appeal order is order no.3623 dated 21st October, 2024. The order reference has been correctly stated in the intimation but the date carries a mistake. 

The department committed error, albeit typographical error in printing date of the order mentioned in impugned intimation. Petitioner’s contention is that the order mentioned in impugned intimation was not served. It could not have been as the particulars of the order themselves carry an error. However, we are convinced that the petitioner was aware all along.

The court quashed the rectification order and the intimation. 

Read More: GST Council Recommendation Not A Precondition For Issuing  S. 168A Notification: Telangana High Court

Case Details

Case Title: M/s. Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd., Versus The Commissioner, CT and GST Odisha, Cuttack and others

Case No.: W.P.(C) No.32208 of 2024

Date: 09/01/2025

Counsel For Petitioner: K.R. Choudhury

Counsel For Respondent: S. Mishra

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Misstates Limitation Period: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Hiring of Diesel Generator Sets with Transfer of Possession and Effective Control Not Taxable as ‘Supply of Tangible Goods Service’: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

3Kg Gold Recovered in Nadia During Probe Into Former TMC MLA Sabyasachi Dutta

The investigation is ongoing against former Trinamool Congress (TMC) legislator and ex-Mayor of Bidhannagar...

More like this

12% IGST Payable On Imported Dialysis Machine Parts: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Appeal Can’t Be Dismissed for Delay When Dept’s Own Order Misstates Limitation Period: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Hiring of Diesel Generator Sets with Transfer of Possession and Effective Control Not Taxable as ‘Supply of Tangible Goods Service’: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...