Mutual Fund Investment Is Not an ‘Exempted Service’; CESTAT Quashes CENVAT Credit Demand

HomeIndirect TaxesMutual Fund Investment Is Not an ‘Exempted Service’; CESTAT Quashes CENVAT Credit...

Mutual Fund Investment Is Not an ‘Exempted Service’; CESTAT Quashes CENVAT Credit Demand

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

05/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Mutual Fund Investment Is Not an ‘Exempted Service’; CESTAT Quashes CENVAT Credit Demand

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside a service tax demand of over ₹1.70 crore, holding that subscription and redemption of mutual fund units cannot be treated as trading of goods or an exempted service, and therefore proportionate reversal of CENVAT credit is not required. The bench of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Cenvat Credit Demand

Mutual Fund Investment Is Not an ‘Exempted Service’; CESTAT Quashes CENVAT Credit Demand

Membership Required

Latest articles

DRI Complaint Before Special Court Not Governed By Private Complaint Procedure: Delhi HC

E-Way Bill and GSTR-3B Mismatch| Allahabad High Court Stays Rs. 142 Crore GST Demand Against Oppo Mobiles

Assessee Can’t Be Left Remediless Due To Improper Communication Of GST Order: Rajasthan High Court Condones Delay

Bombay High Court Permits Amendment Of Reassessment Petitions To Challenge Retrospective Section 147A Inserted By Finance Act, 2026

More like this

DRI Complaint Before Special Court Not Governed By Private Complaint Procedure: Delhi HC

E-Way Bill and GSTR-3B Mismatch| Allahabad High Court Stays Rs. 142 Crore GST Demand Against Oppo Mobiles

Assessee Can’t Be Left Remediless Due To Improper Communication Of GST Order: Rajasthan High Court Condones Delay

About us

Company

Categories