HomeIndirect TaxesMumbai Customs Foils Alleged Rs. 2.5 Crore Anti-Dumping Duty Evasion by Importers...

Mumbai Customs Foils Alleged Rs. 2.5 Crore Anti-Dumping Duty Evasion by Importers Through Plate Tampering

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a major enforcement breakthrough, Mumbai Customs has uncovered an elaborate attempt to evade nearly ₹2.5 crore in anti-dumping duty (ADD) by allegedly altering identification plates on heavy machinery imported from China. The case, officials say, reflects a calculated effort to bypass tariff obligations through post-landing manipulation of machine specifications.

Inspection Triggered Suspicion

The suspected duty-evasion scheme came to light between October 31 and November 1 during a surprise scrutiny conducted by a senior appraising officer at Indira Dock. Three Chinese-manufactured wheel loaders imported by an Indian firm had been stationed in the yard after unloading.

During the first inspection, all machines carried QR-coded capacity plates indicating a payload of 7,000 kg — a specification that attracts ADD under prevailing rules. However, officials were startled when a joint examination the following day revealed entirely new plates affixed on the same loaders. The replacement plates bore no QR codes and instead displayed an upgraded payload figure of 7,100 kg, just above the threshold where ADD ceases to apply.

The sudden overnight alteration, Customs investigators noted, was not only suspicious but also indicative of deliberate engineering to evade statutory duty.

Probe Escalates to Police

Following the discovery, Customs immediately halted clearance of the equipment and transferred the matter to the Special Investigation and Intelligence Branch (SIIB). Technical verification and cross-checks with import documentation confirmed that the original plates had allegedly been removed and replaced with counterfeit ones with inflated figures.

Given the seriousness of the tampering and the apparent intention to defraud the Union government, SIIB officials escalated the matter to law enforcement agencies. An FIR has now been registered against representatives of the importing company based on a complaint filed by Senior Intelligence Officer Dinesh Kumar Mahawar.

“This was not a procedural lapse. The plates were altered after the cargo landed. There was a clear intention to escape anti-dumping duty liability,” a senior Customs officer stated.

The three wheel loaders remain under detention at Mumbai Port as investigators examine CCTV records, entry logs of personnel having access to the yard, and conduct forensic evaluation of both the original and forged plates.

Why Anti-Dumping Duty Matters

Anti-dumping duty is imposed to counter the impact of unfairly priced imports entering the Indian market at rates below fair value. For Chinese wheel loaders, ADD applies only if the machines have a payload capacity of 7,000 kg or below. Units exceeding this threshold are exempt.

In this case, Customs officers had initially documented the loaders with 7,000 kg QR-coded plates. The subsequent shift to non-coded 7,100 kg plates is seen as a deliberate manoeuvre to place the machinery just beyond the taxable capacity bracket.

Significance of the Case

Officials describe the incident as potentially one of the largest attempts at ADD evasion detected at Mumbai Port in recent years. If charges are upheld, the importers may face prosecution under the Customs Act, along with penalties, confiscation of goods, and recovery of evaded duty.

The investigation is ongoing, with authorities focusing on how the tampering was executed inside a secured dockyard and whether any internal or external facilitation was involved.

The case is likely to prompt tighter surveillance protocols for high-risk consignments and may trigger wider scrutiny into machinery imports where specification-based exemptions play a decisive role in duty computation.

Read More: Revenue Sharing Arrangements Don’t Involve Provision Of Service By One Person To Another: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CBIC’s Rs. 2 Crore Litigation Threshold Covers Ongoing Appeals, Not Just Fresh Filings: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the circular issued by Central Board of Indirect...

Jurishour | Tax Law Daily Bulletin : February 23, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for February 23, 2026.GSTGST Orders Passed Without Proper...

India, France Sign Landmark Protocol Amending Double Taxation Avoidance Convention

In a significant step towards deepening bilateral economic cooperation, the Government of India and...

S. 263 Revision Invalid Where AO Took Plausible View on Unlisted Share Gains as Capital Gains: Calcutta High Court

The Calcutta High Court has held that revision under Section 263 of the Income...

More like this

CBIC’s Rs. 2 Crore Litigation Threshold Covers Ongoing Appeals, Not Just Fresh Filings: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the circular issued by Central Board of Indirect...

Jurishour | Tax Law Daily Bulletin : February 23, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for February 23, 2026.GSTGST Orders Passed Without Proper...

India, France Sign Landmark Protocol Amending Double Taxation Avoidance Convention

In a significant step towards deepening bilateral economic cooperation, the Government of India and...