Mobilization Advances Received Prior To March 2011 Not Liable To Immediate Service Tax At The Time Of Receipt: CESTAT

HomeIndirect TaxesMobilization Advances Received Prior To March 2011 Not Liable To Immediate Service...

Mobilization Advances Received Prior To March 2011 Not Liable To Immediate Service Tax At The Time Of Receipt: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

08/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Hyderabad Bench has held that mobilization advances received prior to March 1, 2011, are not liable to immediate Service Tax at the time of receipt. The Bench of Angad Prasad (Judicial Member) and A.K. Jyotishi (Technical Member) examined the statutory framework and held prior to March…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Mobilization Advances Received Prior To March 2011 Not Liable To Immediate Service Tax At The Time Of Receipt: CESTAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 May, 2026

Movement of Goods to Depots for Inventory Replenishment Can’t Be Treated as Inter-State Sale: CESTAT

Customs Broker Can’t Be Penalised for Export of Ergotamine Preparation; S. 117 Not Invocable Where Specific Penalty Provision Exists: CESTAT

Dept. Appeal Doesn’t Automatically Stay Appellate Order; GST Registration Restoration Directions Must Be Followed Without Specific Stay: Allahabad HC

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 May, 2026

Movement of Goods to Depots for Inventory Replenishment Can’t Be Treated as Inter-State Sale: CESTAT

Customs Broker Can’t Be Penalised for Export of Ergotamine Preparation; S. 117 Not Invocable Where Specific Penalty Provision Exists: CESTAT

About us

Company

Categories