Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesMis-declaration of Imported Fabric Justifies Re-classification, Confiscation, Penalties: CESTAT

Mis-declaration of Imported Fabric Justifies Re-classification, Confiscation, Penalties: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Mis-declaration of Imported Fabric Justifies Re-classification, Confiscation, Penalties: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that mis-declaration of imported fabric justifies re-classification, confiscation, and penalties. The bench of  Justice Dilip Gupta (President) and P.V. Subba Rao (Technical Member) has dismissed an importer’s appeal and upheld the re-classification of imported polyester fabric, along with confiscation of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

GSTN Introduces Auto-Population Facility for Additional GST Registrations Under Same PAN

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has introduced a new auto-population facility to...
GST

CGST Dept. Can’t Start Parallel Proceedings After State Officer Acts on Same Matter: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has ruled that the Central GST authorities cannot initiate parallel...
Indirect Taxes

Customs Refund Can’t Be Adjusted Against Disputed Demand That Has Not Attained Finality: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has directed the Customs...
Direct Tax

Income Tax Reassessment Can’t Revisit Issues Examined During Scrutiny Merely Because Original Order Is Silent: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has quashed reassessment proceedings initiated against a taxpayer for Assessment...

More like this

GST

GSTN Introduces Auto-Population Facility for Additional GST Registrations Under Same PAN

The Goods and Services Tax Network (GSTN) has introduced a new auto-population facility to...
GST

CGST Dept. Can’t Start Parallel Proceedings After State Officer Acts on Same Matter: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has ruled that the Central GST authorities cannot initiate parallel...
Indirect Taxes

Customs Refund Can’t Be Adjusted Against Disputed Demand That Has Not Attained Finality: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has directed the Customs...