Mis-declaration of Imported Fabric Justifies Re-classification, Confiscation, Penalties: CESTAT

HomeIndirect TaxesMis-declaration of Imported Fabric Justifies Re-classification, Confiscation, Penalties: CESTAT

Mis-declaration of Imported Fabric Justifies Re-classification, Confiscation, Penalties: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

08/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Mis-declaration of Imported Fabric Justifies Re-classification, Confiscation, Penalties: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that mis-declaration of imported fabric justifies re-classification, confiscation, and penalties. The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta (President) and P.V. Subba Rao (Technical Member) has dismissed an importer’s appeal and upheld the re-classification of imported polyester fabric, along with confiscation of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Mis-declaration of Imported Fabric Justifies Re-classification, Confiscation, Penalties: CESTAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

Dept. Failed to Prove Clandestine Removal In ‘Gold Mohar’ Pan Masala Case: CESTAT Quashes Cash and Goods Confiscation

ITAT Slams Income Tax Dept. For on Third-Party Statements Without Independent Inquiry

More like this

When Service Tax Is Shown Separately In Invoices, Assessee Can’t Later Claim Cum-Tax Benefit Merely Because Tenant Failed To Pay Tax: CESTAT

ITAT Remands Rs. 1.47 Crore Addition Over Unexplained Cash Deposits Under S. 69A

Dept. Failed to Prove Clandestine Removal In ‘Gold Mohar’ Pan Masala Case: CESTAT Quashes Cash and Goods Confiscation

About us

Company

Categories