Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesLimitation Can’t Bar Refund of Tax Paid by Mistake: CESTAT

Limitation Can’t Bar Refund of Tax Paid by Mistake: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Limitation Can’t Bar Refund of Tax Paid by Mistake: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad Bench, has allowed an appeal granting relief in a dispute over refund claims arising from double payment of excise duty and held that the limitation cannot bar refund of tax paid by mistake. The bench of Dr. Ajaya Krishna Vishvesha (Judicial Member) overturned earlier decisions…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court

Arbitral Award Enforcement Drags On For 24 Years: Supreme Court Seeks Law Commission Study On Execution Reforms

The Supreme Court has requested the Law Commission of India to undertake a focused...
GST

Supplier’s Retrospective GST Cancellation Alone Can’t Deny ITC; Fraud Must Be Established U/s 74: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Cuttack State Bench, has held that...
Supreme Court

Loan Advanced Against Promissory Note By Unlicensed Money Lender Doesn’t Constitute Legally Enforceable Debt U/s 138 Of NI Act: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that an interest-bearing loan advanced against a promissory note...
GST

E-Invoice Portal Glitch Can’t Justify 200% GST Penalty Without Intent To Evade Tax: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has set aside a 200%...

More like this

Supreme Court

Arbitral Award Enforcement Drags On For 24 Years: Supreme Court Seeks Law Commission Study On Execution Reforms

The Supreme Court has requested the Law Commission of India to undertake a focused...
GST

Supplier’s Retrospective GST Cancellation Alone Can’t Deny ITC; Fraud Must Be Established U/s 74: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Cuttack State Bench, has held that...
Supreme Court

Loan Advanced Against Promissory Note By Unlicensed Money Lender Doesn’t Constitute Legally Enforceable Debt U/s 138 Of NI Act: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that an interest-bearing loan advanced against a promissory note...