Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesExtended Limitation Not Applicable in Natural Rubber Latex Classification Dispute: CESTAT

Extended Limitation Not Applicable in Natural Rubber Latex Classification Dispute: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Extended Limitation Not Applicable in Natural Rubber Latex Classification Dispute: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside a customs duty demand of over ₹92 crore raised holding that the show cause notice was barred by limitation and unsustainable in law. The bench of M. Ajit Kumar (Technical Member) and Ajayan T.V. (Judicial Member) has allowed the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Valuation Must Follow Statutory Procedure: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that...
Indirect Taxes

Adjudicating Authority Ignored Remand Directions, Reissued ‘Copy-Paste’ Order: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand 

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Company & PMLA

RP Extinguishing Pre-CIRP MVAT Dues Bars Tax Recovery: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Rs. 20.02 Lakh Pre-Deposit

The Bombay High Court has held that once a resolution plan is approved by...
Indirect Taxes

Statutory Return Periodicity Can’t Be Altered by Tax Dept: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 1.27 Crore MVAT Interest Demand Against Microsoft

The Bombay High Court has set aside the levy of substantial interest under Section...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Valuation Must Follow Statutory Procedure: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that...
Indirect Taxes

Adjudicating Authority Ignored Remand Directions, Reissued ‘Copy-Paste’ Order: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand 

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Company & PMLA

RP Extinguishing Pre-CIRP MVAT Dues Bars Tax Recovery: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Rs. 20.02 Lakh Pre-Deposit

The Bombay High Court has held that once a resolution plan is approved by...