Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesIrregularities In Delhi Excise Policy: Delhi High Court Pulls up Aam Aadmi...

Irregularities In Delhi Excise Policy: Delhi High Court Pulls up Aam Aadmi Party After CAG’s Report

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has pulled up Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) after the report of Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) revealing the irregularities in the Delhi excise policy.

“The way you’ve been dragging your feet is something unfortunate. You should’ve been prompt in sending it (reports) to the speaker and having a discussion at the floor of the assembly,” the court told the Delhi government.

A petition was filed by the BJP asking the current Delhi government why there was a delay in presenting the CAG report in the Delhi Assembly.

What Was Pointed Out By CAG report?

The CAG report stated that some bidders who were running in losses but were still given licenses by the then-Arvind Kejriwal government in Delhi.

The CAG report underlined significant lapses in the implementation of the policy that led to a loss of approximately Rs 2,026 crores to the government. 

As per the CAG Report the residents of the city bore the cost while the AAP leaders “got kickbacks”.

The report claimed that Manish Sisodia, who then led the excise department, and his group of ministers “ignored” the recommendations of the expert panel. 

The report pointed out that many key decisions were taken arbitrarily without the approval of the cabinet or the Delhi LG.

Read More: Seva Vikas Co- operative Bank Fraud: PMLA Court Grants Bail To Accused Citing Medical Grounds

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

RP Extinguishing Pre-CIRP MVAT Dues Bars Tax Recovery: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Rs. 20.02 Lakh Pre-Deposit

The Bombay High Court has held that once a resolution plan is approved by...

Statutory Return Periodicity Can’t Be Altered by Tax Dept: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 1.27 Crore MVAT Interest Demand Against Microsoft

The Bombay High Court has set aside the levy of substantial interest under Section...

Bombay High Court Remands ITAT Matter Over Failure to Consider Paper Book Filed With Rule 29 Affidavit

The Bombay High Court has partly set aside an order of the Income Tax...

Rs. 76.72 Lakh Demand Quashed After Adjudicating Authority Ignored CESTAT Order Upholding Refund: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has set aside a demand of ₹76,72,000 raised against a...

More like this

RP Extinguishing Pre-CIRP MVAT Dues Bars Tax Recovery: Bombay HC Orders Refund of Rs. 20.02 Lakh Pre-Deposit

The Bombay High Court has held that once a resolution plan is approved by...

Statutory Return Periodicity Can’t Be Altered by Tax Dept: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 1.27 Crore MVAT Interest Demand Against Microsoft

The Bombay High Court has set aside the levy of substantial interest under Section...

Bombay High Court Remands ITAT Matter Over Failure to Consider Paper Book Filed With Rule 29 Affidavit

The Bombay High Court has partly set aside an order of the Income Tax...