HomeIndirect TaxesIrregularities In Delhi Excise Policy: Delhi High Court Pulls up Aam Aadmi...

Irregularities In Delhi Excise Policy: Delhi High Court Pulls up Aam Aadmi Party After CAG’s Report

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has pulled up Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) after the report of Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) revealing the irregularities in the Delhi excise policy.

“The way you’ve been dragging your feet is something unfortunate. You should’ve been prompt in sending it (reports) to the speaker and having a discussion at the floor of the assembly,” the court told the Delhi government.

A petition was filed by the BJP asking the current Delhi government why there was a delay in presenting the CAG report in the Delhi Assembly.

What Was Pointed Out By CAG report?

The CAG report stated that some bidders who were running in losses but were still given licenses by the then-Arvind Kejriwal government in Delhi.

The CAG report underlined significant lapses in the implementation of the policy that led to a loss of approximately Rs 2,026 crores to the government. 

As per the CAG Report the residents of the city bore the cost while the AAP leaders “got kickbacks”.

The report claimed that Manish Sisodia, who then led the excise department, and his group of ministers “ignored” the recommendations of the expert panel. 

The report pointed out that many key decisions were taken arbitrarily without the approval of the cabinet or the Delhi LG.

Read More: Seva Vikas Co- operative Bank Fraud: PMLA Court Grants Bail To Accused Citing Medical Grounds

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

S. 54 Deduction Can’t Be Restricted Merely Because New House Is Purchased Jointly With Spouse: ITAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Survey Disclosure Can’t Be Reclassified as Se. 69A Income Through Rectification U/s 154: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that income...

Supreme Court Issues Notice on Centre’s Challenge to Telangana HC Verdict Striking Down ISD ITC Distribution Rule

The Supreme Court has issued notice on a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by...

5G Radio Unit Is Classified Under CTH 8517 6260: CESTAT 

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

S. 54 Deduction Can’t Be Restricted Merely Because New House Is Purchased Jointly With Spouse: ITAT

The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Survey Disclosure Can’t Be Reclassified as Se. 69A Income Through Rectification U/s 154: ITAT

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that income...

Supreme Court Issues Notice on Centre’s Challenge to Telangana HC Verdict Striking Down ISD ITC Distribution Rule

The Supreme Court has issued notice on a Special Leave Petition (SLP) filed by...