Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesIrregularities In Delhi Excise Policy: Delhi High Court Pulls up Aam Aadmi...

Irregularities In Delhi Excise Policy: Delhi High Court Pulls up Aam Aadmi Party After CAG’s Report

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has pulled up Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) after the report of Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) revealing the irregularities in the Delhi excise policy.

“The way you’ve been dragging your feet is something unfortunate. You should’ve been prompt in sending it (reports) to the speaker and having a discussion at the floor of the assembly,” the court told the Delhi government.

A petition was filed by the BJP asking the current Delhi government why there was a delay in presenting the CAG report in the Delhi Assembly.

What Was Pointed Out By CAG report?

The CAG report stated that some bidders who were running in losses but were still given licenses by the then-Arvind Kejriwal government in Delhi.

The CAG report underlined significant lapses in the implementation of the policy that led to a loss of approximately Rs 2,026 crores to the government. 

As per the CAG Report the residents of the city bore the cost while the AAP leaders “got kickbacks”.

The report claimed that Manish Sisodia, who then led the excise department, and his group of ministers “ignored” the recommendations of the expert panel. 

The report pointed out that many key decisions were taken arbitrarily without the approval of the cabinet or the Delhi LG.

Read More: Seva Vikas Co- operative Bank Fraud: PMLA Court Grants Bail To Accused Citing Medical Grounds

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

E-Way Bills Required Even Without a Sale: ICAI Handbook Highlights Crucial GST Compliance Rules

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), through its GST & Indirect Taxes...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 5 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 5, 2026.GSTRS. 3.15 CRORE GST REFUND...

Vague Dowry Allegations Can’t Justify Trial Against In-Laws: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings

The Supreme Court has quashed criminal proceedings against a woman’s parents-in-law, holding that general...

Property Sold To Another Buyer Doesn’t Establish Cheating Without Initial Deception: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has quashed criminal proceedings arising from a disputed land sale, holding...

More like this

E-Way Bills Required Even Without a Sale: ICAI Handbook Highlights Crucial GST Compliance Rules

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), through its GST & Indirect Taxes...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 5 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 5, 2026.GSTRS. 3.15 CRORE GST REFUND...

Vague Dowry Allegations Can’t Justify Trial Against In-Laws: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings

The Supreme Court has quashed criminal proceedings against a woman’s parents-in-law, holding that general...