Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesIncorrect Understanding Of Law Can’t Automatically Be Treated As Tax Evasion Intention:...

Incorrect Understanding Of Law Can’t Automatically Be Treated As Tax Evasion Intention: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that incorrect understanding of law cannot automatically be treated as tax evasion intention. The bench of Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati (Judicial Member) has observed that where credit has already been reversed prior to issuance of a show cause notice, recovery proceedings…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court

Alternative Site Must Be Allotted Before Demolishing Flats Built on Waterbody Land; Residential Zoning Can’t Validate Patta: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has directed the Tamil Nadu Government to allot a vacant, commensurate...
GST

Supplier Found Non-Existent Later Can’t Alone Justify ITC Denial: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow State Bench, has set aside...
GST

GST Refund Based On Unchallenged Advance Ruling Can’t Be Recovered Using Later Circular: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Dehradun, has dismissed two appeals filed...
GST

Full Transitional Credit Allowed on Capital Goods Received After GST Rollout: GSTAT Denies Rs. 6.99 Lakh Export Duty Credit

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh State Bench, has held that...

More like this

Supreme Court

Alternative Site Must Be Allotted Before Demolishing Flats Built on Waterbody Land; Residential Zoning Can’t Validate Patta: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has directed the Tamil Nadu Government to allot a vacant, commensurate...
GST

Supplier Found Non-Existent Later Can’t Alone Justify ITC Denial: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow State Bench, has set aside...
GST

GST Refund Based On Unchallenged Advance Ruling Can’t Be Recovered Using Later Circular: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Dehradun, has dismissed two appeals filed...