HomeIndirect TaxesThis Is Why Meghalaya High Court Condones Delay Of 165 Days In...

This Is Why Meghalaya High Court Condones Delay Of 165 Days In Filing Central Excise Appeal

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Meghalaya High Court has condoned the delay of 165 days in filing central excise appeal.

The bench of Justice H. S. Thangkhiew and Justice B. Bhattacharjee has observed that due to the fault of the counsel, in preparing the draft memo of appeal for which the applicant should not suffer.

The assesseee has filed the application for condonation of delay of 165 days, in filing the appeal against the CESTAT final order.
The applicant contended that the considerable delay that has occurred was primarily due to the fault of the counsel, in preparing the draft memo of appeal and that from the part of the Department also, 3months’ time had been taken in considering the matter.

The respondent/department contended that sufficient cause has not been shown in seeking the condonation. As no ground has been made out, the condonation application should be rejected.

The court held that the applicant should not suffer. As such, the delay of 165 days is condoned. 

Case Details

Case Title: The Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax and Central Excise Versus M/s Lamare & Company

Case No.: MC Central Excise Ap. No. 4 of 2024

Date: 17.02.2025

Counsel For Appellant: N. Mozika

Counsel For Respondent: D. Sahu

Read More: Urban Ladder Home Décor Not Liable To TDS On Remittances To Facebook, Amazon Web-Services For Advertisements: Karnataka High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Medical Colleges Not Entitled to Five-Year Subvention After TMA Pai Verdict: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that private professional colleges cannot claim continuation of the...

Non-Signatory Shareholder Bound by Arbitration Clause: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a shareholder who did not sign a Memorandum...

Can Buyers Bypass MSME Council and Invoke Arbitration Act Directly? Supreme Court Leaves Question Open

The Supreme Court has left unresolved a significant legal question concerning the interplay between...

Statutory GST Appeal Can’t Be Circumvented by Mere Natural Justice Allegations: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has reiterated that allegations of violation of natural justice, without...

More like this

Medical Colleges Not Entitled to Five-Year Subvention After TMA Pai Verdict: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has ruled that private professional colleges cannot claim continuation of the...

Non-Signatory Shareholder Bound by Arbitration Clause: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a shareholder who did not sign a Memorandum...

Can Buyers Bypass MSME Council and Invoke Arbitration Act Directly? Supreme Court Leaves Question Open

The Supreme Court has left unresolved a significant legal question concerning the interplay between...