Hardline Approach Toward Small Importers “Counter-Productive”: Bombay High Court Quashes Order After Seized Goods Deteriorate

HomeIndirect TaxesHardline Approach Toward Small Importers “Counter-Productive”: Bombay High Court Quashes Order After...

Hardline Approach Toward Small Importers “Counter-Productive”: Bombay High Court Quashes Order After Seized Goods Deteriorate

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

09/03/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Hardline Approach Toward Small Importers “Counter-Productive”: Bombay High Court Quashes Order After Seized Goods Deteriorate

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court set aside an Order-in-Original issued by Customs authorities after finding that the imported goods had completely deteriorated during the course of the dispute and stated that the hardline approach toward small importers was “counter-productive”. The bench of Justice G. S. Kulkarni and Justice Aarti Sathe has directed the authorities to issue…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Counter-Productive

Hardline Approach Toward Small Importers “Counter-Productive”: Bombay High Court Quashes Order After Seized Goods Deteriorate

Membership Required

Latest articles

Former Additional Director Can’t Be Held Liable for Company’s Later Violations: Karnataka HC Quashes DGFT Order

Madras High Court Allows Fresh GST Adjudication on 10% Pre-Deposit, Orders Lifting of Bank Attachment

Absconding Proposed Detenue Can’t Challenge COFEPOSA Detention at Pre-Execution Stage: Delhi HC

Whether Whey Protein with Over 80% Protein Content Falls Under Tariff Heading 3502 or 2106? Delhi HC Directs CAAR to Reconsider

More like this

Former Additional Director Can’t Be Held Liable for Company’s Later Violations: Karnataka HC Quashes DGFT Order

Madras High Court Allows Fresh GST Adjudication on 10% Pre-Deposit, Orders Lifting of Bank Attachment

Absconding Proposed Detenue Can’t Challenge COFEPOSA Detention at Pre-Execution Stage: Delhi HC

About us

Company

Categories