Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesGold Smuggling in Shoes: CESTAT Cuts Rs. 30 Lakh Penalty to Rs....

Gold Smuggling in Shoes: CESTAT Cuts Rs. 30 Lakh Penalty to Rs. 10 Lakh

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has reduced the penalty imposed on Suvadeep Dutta from Rs. 30 lakh to Rs. 10 lakh, even as it upheld his complicity in a high-profile gold smuggling case at the Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose International Airport.

The bench of K. Anpazhakan (Technical Member), noted that the chain of events—including phone records, intercepted calls, and corroborative statements—pointed to Dutta’s role in facilitating the smuggling operation. Dutta had allegedly arranged logistics, including SIM cards and transportation, and was actively involved in the planning at a local restaurant, Spice Garden Bar near Chinar Park, a day prior to the attempted smuggling.

The case dates back to January 2015, when Customs officers intercepted one Avijit Sarkar, a ground staffer, and recovered 3 kg of 24 karat gold bars worth ₹82.5 lakh concealed in his shoes. Investigations revealed a smuggling network involving multiple airport personnel.

In his statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act, Sarkar disclosed that he had been recruited for the smuggling operation by Suvadeep Dutta and Ajit Kumar Majhi, an employee of the Airports Authority of India. Sarkar stated that Dutta had handed him the specially modified shoes used to conceal the gold and briefed him on the operation near Gate 3C of the airport.

Although Dutta denied involvement, the tribunal found that his actions—including evading summons, seeking anticipatory bail, and maintaining close communication with co-accused—reflected consciousness of guilt. The tribunal also criticized the appellant for trying to mislead authorities by denying his presence at key locations.

However, while affirming Dutta’s role under Sections 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, the tribunal considered the extent of his involvement and reduced the penalty to Rs. 10 lakh.

Case Details

Case Title: Suvadeep Dutta Versus Customs Commissioner

Case No.: Customs Appeal No. 77222 of 2019

Date:  15.07.2025

Counsel For  Appellant: Nilotpal Chowdhury, Advocate

Counsel For Respondent: Sourabh Chakravorty, Authorized Representative

Read More: Top Skills That Help You Earn Without Investment in 2025

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

POCSO Conviction Set Aside Over Doubts About Accused’s Identity And Gaps In Evidence: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has acquitted a man convicted of sexually assaulting an 11-year-old girl...

Earlier Temporary Or Compassionate Appointment Does Not Give Seniority Over Direct Recruits: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that employees appointed temporarily or on compassionate grounds cannot...

Full Enhanced Land Compensation Must Be Deposited; Landowners Can Withdraw 8.33% Pending Appeal: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has directed the Meerut Development Authority to deposit the entire enhanced...

More like this

POCSO Conviction Set Aside Over Doubts About Accused’s Identity And Gaps In Evidence: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has acquitted a man convicted of sexually assaulting an 11-year-old girl...

Earlier Temporary Or Compassionate Appointment Does Not Give Seniority Over Direct Recruits: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that employees appointed temporarily or on compassionate grounds cannot...