Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesGold Smuggling Accused Granted Bail by Mumbai Court Citing 'Inadequate Arrest'

Gold Smuggling Accused Granted Bail by Mumbai Court Citing ‘Inadequate Arrest’

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Esplanade Court in Mumbai granted bail to a 24-year-old man accused of smuggling gold, citing “inadequate arrest” procedures by the customs department. The accused was arrested earlier in the day after officials claimed to have recovered three capsules of gold dust worth ₹1.10 crore from him.

According to customs officials, the man confessed during interrogation, stating that someone handed him the gold in the airport’s transit passage, and he was supposed to deliver it to a contact outside the airport. “Since we found no one else outside, we proceeded with the arrest,” an official explained. Authorities were investigating further to identify other possible connections in the smuggling racket.

However, during the court hearing, the accused’s lawyer, Advocate Prabhakar Tripathi, argued that the arrest was flawed. 

“The family of the accused was not informed, and the grounds of arrest were not made clear. This violates the mandatory provisions under Sections 47 and 48 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the constitutional safeguard under Article 22(1). Every citizen has the fundamental right to be informed of the grounds of arrest and to legal representation,” Tripathi stated.

The customs department had sought 14-day judicial custody, but the court granted bail, citing the procedural lapses. The bail was set at ₹25,000, with the court emphasizing the importance of adhering to due process in such cases.

Read More: CGST Raid Uncovers Worth ₹3 Crore Illegal Paan Masala & Zarda in Gurugram

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Hybrid Seed Production on Leased Farmland Qualifies as Agricultural Activity: ITAT Deletes Addition

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Rajkot Bench, has held that income earned from...

S. 263 Revision Can’t Be Used for Fresh Fishing Inquiry When AO Has Already Examined Issues: ITAT Quashes PCIT Order

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the...

S. 271DA Penalty Notice Must Be Issued Within 6 Months of AO’s Reference; Karnataka High Court Quashes Time-Barred Cash Receipt Penalty

The Karnataka High Court has held that although penalty proceedings under Section 271DA of...

Delayed Compliance With Income Tax Notice Is Not Complete Failure: Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Dropped

The Income Tax Department has dropped penalty proceedings initiated under Section 272A(1)(d) of the...

More like this

Hybrid Seed Production on Leased Farmland Qualifies as Agricultural Activity: ITAT Deletes Addition

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Rajkot Bench, has held that income earned from...

S. 263 Revision Can’t Be Used for Fresh Fishing Inquiry When AO Has Already Examined Issues: ITAT Quashes PCIT Order

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the...

S. 271DA Penalty Notice Must Be Issued Within 6 Months of AO’s Reference; Karnataka High Court Quashes Time-Barred Cash Receipt Penalty

The Karnataka High Court has held that although penalty proceedings under Section 271DA of...