Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesDelhi High Court Directs Release of Seized Gold Bars to Oman-Based Passenger;...

Delhi High Court Directs Release of Seized Gold Bars to Oman-Based Passenger; Orders Re-Assessment of Patek Philippe Automatic Luxury Watch

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has directed Customs authorities to release 4 gold bars seized from Oman-based Indian national Mir Fasil Khurseed, while ordering a re-assessment of a luxury wristwatch also confiscated during his arrival at the Indira Gandhi International Airport (IGIA) in November 2023.

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Shail Jain has directed the matter be expedited. Subsequently, when the Department accepted the Appellate Authority’s order, Customs implemented the ruling within four weeks.

The case stemmed from Khurseed’s arrival from Muscat on November 23, 2023, when Customs officials intercepted him after he opted for the Green Channel. Authorities detained 80 grams of gold (four 20-gram bars of 999.9 purity) and a high-end “Patek Philippe” automatic watch, citing violations under the Customs Act, 1962.

An Order-in-Original (OIO) issued on January 11, 2024, held Khurseed ineligible for free allowance under baggage rules, ordered confiscation of the seized items valued at ₹4.61 lakh, and imposed a penalty of Rs. 46,000. The Customs Department, however, allowed redemption of the goods upon payment of a fine of Rs. 55,000 for re-export.

The Department later challenged the OIO before the Appellate Authority, which on June 27, 2025, partially modified the decision. It ordered release of the gold bars upon payment of a redemption fine of ₹66,000, but remanded the case regarding the Patek Philippe watch for fresh adjudication after re-assessment of its value.

The court instructed Khurseed to appear before Customs officials on August 27, 2025, for release of the gold bars. On the same day, authorities are to grant him a hearing regarding the reassessment of the luxury watch.

Case Details

Case Title: Mir Fasil Khurseed Versus Commissioner Of Customs & Anr. 

Case No.: W.P.(C) 5501/2025 & CM APPL. 42874/2025

Date:  22nd August, 2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Dr. Ashutosh & Ms. Fatima

Counsel For Respondent: Aditya Singla

Read More: Best Ways to Make Money Online From Home in 2025

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...

Refund of Interest Paid on GST Liability Discharged Through ITC: GSTAT Restrains State Benches From Deciding Appeals

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has restrained...

More like this

Personal Hearing Can’t Precede Deadline for GST Notice Reply: Uttarakhand High Court Quashes S. 73 Order

The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a GST assessment order after finding that...

GST Rectification Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because 3 Month Timeline Expired; Authority Doesn’t Become Functus Officio: Uttarakhand High Court

The Uttarakhand High Court has ruled that a GST rectification application filed within the...

Electricity Charges Arise Only After Supply and Billing; Supreme Court Rejects Rs. 57.74 Lakh Demand for Unreleased Additional Load

The Supreme Court has rejected an electricity distribution company’s attempt to recover ₹57.74 lakh...