Extended Period Of Limitation Can’t Be Invoked By Merely Citing ITR

HomeIndirect TaxesExtended Period Of Limitation Can’t Be Invoked By Merely Citing ITR–Form 26AS...

Extended Period Of Limitation Can’t Be Invoked By Merely Citing ITR–Form 26AS Mismatch: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

17/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Extended Period Of Limitation Can’t Be Invoked By Merely Citing ITR–Form 26AS Mismatch: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside a service tax demand of Rs. 7.03 lakh, along with interest and penalties, holding that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked in the absence of evidence of taxable services or suppression of facts. The bench of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Extended Period Of Limitation Can’t Be Invoked By Merely Citing ITR–Form 26AS Mismatch: CESTAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

Supreme Court Dismisses GST Dept.’s Challenge Over Rs. 70.09 Lakh Refund Due to 394-Day Delay; Keeps Rule 90(2) Interpretation Open

GST Appeal Limitation Can’t Begin Merely From Portal Upload: Rajasthan High Court Condones 450-Day Delay

Pending Regularisation Proceedings Must Be Respected: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Direction

Pre-2017 Open University Qualifications Can’t Be Used to Deny Promotion: Supreme Court

More like this

Supreme Court Dismisses GST Dept.’s Challenge Over Rs. 70.09 Lakh Refund Due to 394-Day Delay; Keeps Rule 90(2) Interpretation Open

GST Appeal Limitation Can’t Begin Merely From Portal Upload: Rajasthan High Court Condones 450-Day Delay

Pending Regularisation Proceedings Must Be Respected: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Direction

About us

Company

Categories