Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Without Proof of Tax Evasion Intent: CESTAT

HomeIndirect TaxesExtended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Without Proof of Tax Evasion Intent: CESTAT

Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Without Proof of Tax Evasion Intent: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

28/11/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Without Proof of Tax Evasion Intent: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi, has ruled that the extended period of limitation under Section 73(1) of the Finance Act cannot be invoked unless the department establishes a clear and deliberate intent to evade tax. The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta, (President) and P.V. Subba Rao (Technical Member) observed that…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Tax Evasion Intent

Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked Without Proof of Tax Evasion Intent: CESTAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

Absence of Recovery Mechanism Fatal to Demand: CESTAT

CESTAT Clears Telecom Credit Row: Indus Towers Wins Big on CENVAT Claims

Telecom Towers are “Goods,” Not Immovable Property: CESTAT

Supreme Court Declines Immediate Intervention on Plea to Shorten 5-Year LL.B Course

More like this

Absence of Recovery Mechanism Fatal to Demand: CESTAT

CESTAT Clears Telecom Credit Row: Indus Towers Wins Big on CENVAT Claims

Telecom Towers are “Goods,” Not Immovable Property: CESTAT

About us

Company

Categories