Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesExport Duty Can’t Be Levied On Goods Supplied From DTA To SEZs:...

Export Duty Can’t Be Levied On Goods Supplied From DTA To SEZs: Supreme Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has held that no export duty can be levied on goods supplied from the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) to Special Economic Zones (SEZs).

The bench of Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Justice R. Mahadevan has observed that Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962 is the charging Section. However, under Section 26 of the SEZ Act, power is reserved to grant an exemption or a concession if under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962, a duty is leviable as per the charging Sections.

Since common legal questions were involved, all the civil appeals filed by the Union Of India were heard together and decided by a common judgment. The appeals arose from orders of different High Courts, including Gujarat, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Madras, and Bombay.

The Gujarat High Court examined these issues in detail, holding that export duty cannot be imposed on goods supplied from the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) to SEZ units or developers. In paragraph 42 of its judgment, it concluded that such movement of goods does not amount to “export” for the purposes of levying duty, and therefore, companies are not liable to pay export duty on DTA-to-SEZ transfers. 

The Supreme Court considered the rival contentions in light of the provisions of both the Customs Act (Sections 12, 2(18), 2(27)) and the SEZ Act (Sections 2(i), 2(m), 2(za), and 51).

The Supreme Court has dismissed multiple appeals filed by the Union of India.

Case Details

Case Title: UOI Versus M/S Adani Power Ltd.

Case No.: Civil Appeal No.4489 Of 2023

Date: 28/08/2025

Read More: Income Tax Notice To Salaried Employees: All You Need To Know

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

E-Way Bills Required Even Without a Sale: ICAI Handbook Highlights Crucial GST Compliance Rules

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), through its GST & Indirect Taxes...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 5 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 5, 2026.GSTRS. 3.15 CRORE GST REFUND...

Vague Dowry Allegations Can’t Justify Trial Against In-Laws: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings

The Supreme Court has quashed criminal proceedings against a woman’s parents-in-law, holding that general...

Property Sold To Another Buyer Doesn’t Establish Cheating Without Initial Deception: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has quashed criminal proceedings arising from a disputed land sale, holding...

More like this

E-Way Bills Required Even Without a Sale: ICAI Handbook Highlights Crucial GST Compliance Rules

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI), through its GST & Indirect Taxes...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 5 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 5, 2026.GSTRS. 3.15 CRORE GST REFUND...

Vague Dowry Allegations Can’t Justify Trial Against In-Laws: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings

The Supreme Court has quashed criminal proceedings against a woman’s parents-in-law, holding that general...