HomeIndirect TaxesNo Entry Tax Payable On Tractor Trolly: Orissa High Court

No Entry Tax Payable On Tractor Trolly: Orissa High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Orissa High Court has held that entry tax is not payable on tractor trolleys.

The bench of Justice Arindam Sinha and Justice M.S. Sahoo has observed that Section 2(h) in the Entry Tax Act defines only motor vehicle to mean the same as defined in clause (28) of section 2 excluding tractor.

Section 2(h) from Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999 defines “Motor Vehicle”, which  means a motor vehicle as defined in clause (28) of Section 2 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (59 1988) [excluding any tractor , earthmover , excavator , bulldozer or road-roller].

Section 2(28) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 defines “motor vehicle” or “vehicle” which means any mechanically propelled vehicle adapted for use upon roads whether the power of propulsion is transmitted thereto from an external or internal source and includes a chassis to which a body has not been attached and a trailer. But does not include a vehicle running upon fixed rails or a vehicle of a special type adapted for use only in a factory or in any other enclosed premises or a vehicle having less than four wheels fitted with engine capacity of not exceeding [twenty- five cubic centimetres].

Read More: Excise Dept. Must Have Asked For Original CAS-4 Certificate Before Rejecting On The Basis Of Xerox: CESTAT

Issue Raised

Is a tractor trolly ‘motor vehicle’ for the purposes of Section 2 (h) of the Orissa Entry tax Act, 1999 (OET Act) and is it amenable to entry tax?

Arguments 

The petitioner-assessee contended that entry tax is not leviable on the product being a tractor trailer. 

The department contended that only tractors are excluded from the definition of motor vehicle by section 2(h) in Orissa Entry Tax Act, 1999. Said section makes applicable definition of motor vehicle given in section 2(28) in the Act of 1988 excluding, inter alia, tractor. It does not exclude trailers. No question of law arises for the revision to be admitted. Even though a trailer is drawn by a motor vehicle, by itself being a motor vehicle, the tractor trailer would constitute a goods carrier. 

The department has laid the emphasis on the Supreme Court having a trailer drawn by a motor vehicle, it by itself is a motor vehicle with reference to definition under section 2(28) in Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. 

Conclusion

The court while allowing the petition held that the product manufactured by the petitioner does not have a motor. As such, it can only find meaning as given for ‘vehicle’, by section 2(28) in Motor Vehicles Act. 1988. Section 2(h) in Entry Tax Act, 1999 defines ‘motor vehicle’. There is no definition of ‘vehicle’ in that Act. 

Case Title: M/s. Aman Enterprises Versus State of Odisha and others

Case No.: STREV No.6 of 2022 and STREV No.7 of 2022

Date: 11/09/2024

Counsel For Petitioner: R.P. Kar

Counsel For Respondent: A.K. Sharma

Read Order

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

TDS Credit Can’t Be Restrict Due to Mismatch Between Form 26AS and ITR While Processing Return: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench has held that the Central Processing...

Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked for SAD Demand on FTWZ–DTA Stock Transfers: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Meerut DGGI | Court Denies Bail to Transporter Accused of Moving Areca Nuts Worth Rs. 5,000 Crore Without E-Way Bills

A Meerut court has rejected the bail application of Dilip Kumar Jha, a transporter...

MPID Act Overrides Income Tax, PMLA Claims: Bombay High Court Upholds Release of Seized Rs. 60 Crore for Investor Repayment 

The Bombay High Court while upholding the release of seized Rs. 60 Crore for...

More like this

TDS Credit Can’t Be Restrict Due to Mismatch Between Form 26AS and ITR While Processing Return: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench has held that the Central Processing...

Extended Limitation Can’t Be Invoked for SAD Demand on FTWZ–DTA Stock Transfers: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Meerut DGGI | Court Denies Bail to Transporter Accused of Moving Areca Nuts Worth Rs. 5,000 Crore Without E-Way Bills

A Meerut court has rejected the bail application of Dilip Kumar Jha, a transporter...