Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesEntertainment Tax Not Payable On Online Movie Booking Charges: Supreme Court

Entertainment Tax Not Payable On Online Movie Booking Charges: Supreme Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Recently, the Supreme Court while upholding the Madras High Court decision held that the entertainment tax is not payable on online movie booking charges.

The court ruled that “Extra charge is not for entertainment but it is for the convenience of the people who can book the ticket online without having to travel all the way to the cinema theatres. Petrol/Diesel saved, parking fees etc. This is the convenience charge that is being taken. How can it be under entertainment tax?,”

The bench stated that the charge was being levied for a service and cannot fall under the purview of entertainment tax.

“So instead of going directly to the cinema theatre where I can get the ticket directly, I am buying it from my home, so that is the charge you are taking for your service. How will that come under entertainment tax? I am getting a ticket through luxury instead of going to talkies or theatres. Will this be under entertainment tax? This is extra convenience that is being provided to me. It has no link with the movie or entertainment part,” the court remarked.

Issue Raised

Whether entertainment tax is payable on online ticket booking charges?

Ruling By Madras High Court

Madras High Court held that online booking charges levied by cinema hall owners which do not form part of the ticket cost, cannot be subjected to entertainment tax under Tamil Nadu Entertainment Tax Act, 1939.

The department appealed against the order of the Madras High Court and contended that extra charges that are paid online are to watch the movie and should, therefore, come under the head of entertainment tax.

The Apex Court dismissed the appeal of the department.

Case Name : Commercial Tax Officer v. PVR Limited

Judicial Level & Location : Supreme Court

Case Number :  SLP(C) No. 4312-4316/2022

Date Of Ruling : 30-07-2024

Ruling In Favour Of: Assessee

Coram:  Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice N Kotiswar Singh

Petitioner Advocate: Sabarish Subramanian

Respondent Advocate:   Dhananjay Garg

Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour Team
Juris Hour is an online news portal for reporting accurate and honest news, articles, judgments, Circulars, orders and notifications related to legal developments. We use the tagline ‘Proficiency At Your Doorstep’. Our mission is to simplify and communicate various legal developments in various spheres like civil, criminal, taxation, etc. and make people aware of their rights and duties in order to empower them to contribute in nation-building.Juris Hour is a team of young professionals turned legal journalists who are guided by the values enshrined in the Preamble of the Constitution of India and want to create more legal awareness in society by acting as a tool to aid legal reforms by offering a space for constructive criticism of the judiciary.

Latest articles

Digestion-Based Time-of-Death Estimates Can’t Displace Reliable Eyewitness Accounts: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has upheld the convictions and life sentences in a double-murder case,...

Handwriting Expert Must Be Examined To Prove Disputed Letters: Supreme Court Quashes Suicide Abetment Conviction

The Supreme Court has acquitted a man convicted of abetting his estranged wife’s suicide,...

Plaint Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because Suit May Fail At Trial: Supreme Court Directs Record Of Pre-Registration Rejections

The Supreme Court has held that the likelihood of a civil suit being dismissed...

Prime Roadside Land Can’t Be Arbitrarily Allotted Away From Original Tenure Holders: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has upheld an Allahabad High Court judgment directing restoration of a...

More like this

Digestion-Based Time-of-Death Estimates Can’t Displace Reliable Eyewitness Accounts: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has upheld the convictions and life sentences in a double-murder case,...

Handwriting Expert Must Be Examined To Prove Disputed Letters: Supreme Court Quashes Suicide Abetment Conviction

The Supreme Court has acquitted a man convicted of abetting his estranged wife’s suicide,...

Plaint Can’t Be Rejected Merely Because Suit May Fail At Trial: Supreme Court Directs Record Of Pre-Registration Rejections

The Supreme Court has held that the likelihood of a civil suit being dismissed...