HomeIndirect TaxesDRI Launches 'Operation Fire Trail', Seizes Rs. 35 Crore Worth of Illegally...

DRI Launches ‘Operation Fire Trail’, Seizes Rs. 35 Crore Worth of Illegally Imported Chinese Firecrackers

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) has successfully intercepted and seized a massive consignment valued at approximately ₹35 crore. The operation, codenamed “Operation Fire Trail”, led to the recovery of over 100 metric tonnes of illicitly imported fireworks that were misdeclared and hidden across seven containers located at Nhava Sheva Port, Mundra Port, and Kandla Special Economic Zone (SEZ).

According to official sources, the contraband was falsely declared as harmless items such as “Mini Decorative Plants,” “Artificial Flowers,” and “Plastic Mats.” The consignment was linked to a KASEZ unit and certain Importer Exporter Code (IEC) holders who allegedly orchestrated the smuggling attempt.

One of the containers was notably routed through Kandla SEZ, with the intention of diverting the consignment into the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) in violation of SEZ regulations. A key suspect—a partner of the SEZ unit involved in the operation—has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody by the competent court.

The import of firecrackers into India is classified as ‘Restricted’ under the ITC (HS) Classification of the Foreign Trade Policy, and requires mandatory licensing from both the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) and Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organisation (PESO) as per Explosives Rules, 2008. The illegally imported fireworks were also found to contain banned chemicals such as red lead, copper oxide, and lithium—raising serious health and safety concerns.

Authorities have underscored the public safety risks posed by the smuggled firecrackers, highlighting their highly combustible nature and the threat they pose to port infrastructure and the logistics supply chain.

This well-coordinated enforcement action by the DRI highlights the agency’s firm stance against smuggling and its ongoing efforts to safeguard the integrity of India’s Exim trade ecosystem. By intercepting these shipments, the DRI has averted potentially catastrophic hazards, including accidental explosions and supply chain disruptions.

The agency reiterated its commitment to detect, deter, and dismantle smuggling syndicates, with a continued focus on protecting national infrastructure and public welfare.

Read More: Rudy Guede Faces Fresh Charges: What His Case Reveals About Modern Surveillance and Post-Prison Reintegration

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...

GST | Allahabad High Court Restores Opportunity to Reply in S. 74 Proceedings, Quashes Adjudication Order Passed Without Hearing

The Allahabad High Court has set aside a GST adjudication order passed against an...

More like this

GST Dept. Can’t Reassess Undisputed Pre-GST CENVAT Credit Through TRAN-1 Proceedings: GSTAT Restores Rs. 32.80 Crore Transitional ITC 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Thane Bench, has held that GST...

No Mandatory Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only GST Appeals Arising Before Oct. 1, 2025: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Hyderabad Bench, has held that taxpayers...

Retrospective Invocation of S. 122(1A) for FY 2018–19 Questioned: Allahabad High Court Stays GST Penalty Recovery

The Allahabad High Court has granted interim protection to a taxpayer by staying coercive...