HomeIndirect TaxesDelhi High Court Directs Customs Release Of ‘Name Engraved’ Gold Kada  

Delhi High Court Directs Customs Release Of ‘Name Engraved’ Gold Kada  

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has directed the customs department to release of ‘name engraved’ Gold Kada.

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta has observed that gold kada was a personal effect of the Petitioner as his name `SAI’ was engraved on the same.

The petitioner, Sai Kiran Goud Tirupathi has challenged the seizure of the gold Kada seized.

The Petitioner is an Indian citizen, who was travelling from Mali to India and had landed at Indira Gandhi International Airport, New Delhi on 12th March, 2024. He was wearing a gold Kada weighing 50 grams, which was seized by the Customs Department upon arrival. Appraisal of the same was done and the Kada was valued at Rs.2,85,079 as it had 986 average purity.

The petitioner contended that no show cause notice was issued to him and more than one year has elapsed since the detention. Hence, the Petitioner has filed the petition seeking setting aside of the detention order and release of Kada.

The department contended that the Petitioner has waived of the show cause notice and personal hearing. The Order-in-Original has already been passed on 30th January, 2025 directing absolute confiscation of the gold kada.

The court held that the order in original cannot be sustained and the same is accordingly quashed. The gold Kada will be released, however, subject to payment of storage charges.

Case Details

Case Title: Sai Kiran Goud Tirupathi Versus Commissioner Of Customs

Case No.: W.P.(C) 3347/2025

Date: 18th March, 2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Ravi Rathore

Counsel For Respondent: Harpreet Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel

Read More: Can an FIR Be Filed Against Justice Yashwant Varma? A Look at Supreme Court Precedents

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 22, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT ISSUES NOTICE IN...

Parts Must Be Classified With Parent Printers: Customs Dept. Drops ₹23.63 Lakh Duty Demand on Inkjet Printheads [READ ORDER]

Mumbai Customs has dropped a customs duty demand of ₹23.63 lakh against M/s. Mehta...

Appeal Filed Within 21 Days Must Be Heard Without Limitation Objection: Gauhati High Court Extends Interim Protection in GST Dispute

The Gauhati High Court has granted further interim protection in a GST dispute involving...

GSTAT Special Bench to Decide Whether Delay Beyond S. 107 Time Limit Can Be Condoned

The Special Bench of the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) has decided...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 JULY, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for July 22, 2026.GSTSUPREME COURT ISSUES NOTICE IN...

Parts Must Be Classified With Parent Printers: Customs Dept. Drops ₹23.63 Lakh Duty Demand on Inkjet Printheads [READ ORDER]

Mumbai Customs has dropped a customs duty demand of ₹23.63 lakh against M/s. Mehta...

Appeal Filed Within 21 Days Must Be Heard Without Limitation Objection: Gauhati High Court Extends Interim Protection in GST Dispute

The Gauhati High Court has granted further interim protection in a GST dispute involving...