Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesDept. Can’t Initiate Proceedings Based On Delayed Audit Report U/s 41(4) Of...

Dept. Can’t Initiate Proceedings Based On Delayed Audit Report U/s 41(4) Of OVAT Act: Orissa High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Orissa High Court has held that the department cannot initiate the proceeding consequent to delayed audit report under section 41(4) of Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004.

The bench of Justice Arindam Sinha and Justice Sanjay Kumar Mishra relied on the decision of M/s. Bateman Engineering (India) Private Limited v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, Orissa and others in which it was held that the mandatory nature of the time limits set out in Section 41(4) of the OVAT Act that the report must be submitted within seven days of the conclusion of the audit visit.

The petitioner/assessee has raised the issue whether the department can undertake audit and does not report on it within time prescribed by section 41(4), can the belated report be relied upon for consequent proceeding taken by it.

Section 41 of the Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004 relates to the identification of the taxpayers for the tax audits. Section 41(4) states that after completion of tax audit of any dealer under sub-section (3), the officer authorised to conduct such audit shall, within seven days from the date of completion of the audit, submit the audit report, to be called “audit visit report”, to the assessing authority in the prescribed form alongwith the statements recorded and documents obtained evidencing suppression of purchases or sales, or both, erroneous claims of deductions including input tax credit and evasion of tax, if any, relevant for the purpose of investigation, assessment or such other purposes.

The court held that with the time limit not having been adhered to as far as the present case is concerned, the Court has no hesitation in concluding that all proceedings consequent including the assessment order are unsustainable in law. The assessment order and all proceedings and orders consequent are set aside.

Read More: Reassessment Or Rejection Of Declared Value Can’t Merely Be Based On NIDB Data: Delhi High Court Grants Relief To Importers

Case Details

Case Title: M/s. Aman Enterprises Versus State of Odisha and others

Case No.: STREV No.9 of 2022

Date: 27.11.2024

Counsel For Petitioner: R.P. Kar, Sr. Advocate and S.A. Mohanty, Advocate

Counsel For Respondent: S. Mishra

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...

Circumstantial Evidence Failed to Form Complete Chain: Supreme Court Acquits 4 Murder Accused 

The Supreme Court has acquitted four accused persons in a 2001 murder case from...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 18 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 18, 2026.GSTMADRAS HIGH COURT QUASHES GST CLASSIFICATION...

Dept’s Stand on Export Quota Premium, Rejects CBDT O.M. to Extend S. 80HHC Benefit

The Supreme Court has dismissed a batch of civil appeals concerning the tax treatment...

Conditional Court Deposit Doesn’t Stop Interest: Supreme Court  Calls for Uniform Rules on Litigation Deposits

The Supreme Court of India has held that a deposit made by an award-debtor...