The Bombay High Court has reiterated the strict statutory limitation framework under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, holding that delay beyond the prescribed condonable period cannot be entertained by appellate authorities, even in cases involving claims of interest on rebate. The bench of Justice G. S. Kulkarni and Justice Aarti Sathe found…
HomeIndirect TaxesDelay Beyond Prescribed Condonable Period Can’t Be Entertained By Appellate Authorities, Even...
Delay Beyond Prescribed Condonable Period Can’t Be Entertained By Appellate Authorities, Even In Interest Claims On Rebate: Bombay High Court
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.
Latest articles
Indirect Taxes
Services Used for Setting Up Factory Continue to Qualify as ‘Input Services’: CESTAT
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes
Customs Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data Without Proof of Comparable Imports: CESTAT
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
GST
Bona Fide Mistakes Shouldn’t Defeat Substantive Tax Rights: Karnataka High Court Allows Correction of GST DRC-03 Filing Error
The Karnataka High Court has ruled that a bona fide error in Form GST...
Indirect Taxes
Procedural Delay Should Not Defeat Scheme Benefits: CESTAT Directs Manual Processing of SVLDRS Discharge Certificate
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
More like this
Indirect Taxes
Services Used for Setting Up Factory Continue to Qualify as ‘Input Services’: CESTAT
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes
Customs Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data Without Proof of Comparable Imports: CESTAT
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
GST
Bona Fide Mistakes Shouldn’t Defeat Substantive Tax Rights: Karnataka High Court Allows Correction of GST DRC-03 Filing Error
The Karnataka High Court has ruled that a bona fide error in Form GST...

