Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesDelay Beyond Prescribed Condonable Period Can’t Be Entertained By Appellate Authorities, Even...

Delay Beyond Prescribed Condonable Period Can’t Be Entertained By Appellate Authorities, Even In Interest Claims On Rebate: Bombay High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has reiterated the strict statutory limitation framework under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, holding that delay beyond the prescribed condonable period cannot be entertained by appellate authorities, even in cases involving claims of interest on rebate. The bench of Justice G. S. Kulkarni and Justice Aarti Sathe found…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 12, 2026.GSTCBI ARRESTS CGST SUPERINTENDENT FOR ALLEGEDLY...

SBI Develops UPI-Based Lending Model for Small Businesses Without GST Registration

State Bank of India (SBI) is developing a new digital lending framework that could...

Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Proceedings Based Solely on Omitted Rule 96(10)

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice and the consequential...

Rs. 1,800 Shortfall in GST Appeal Pre-Deposit Can’t Defeat Appellate Remedy: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has restored a GST appeal that was rejected because the...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 12 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 12, 2026.GSTCBI ARRESTS CGST SUPERINTENDENT FOR ALLEGEDLY...

SBI Develops UPI-Based Lending Model for Small Businesses Without GST Registration

State Bank of India (SBI) is developing a new digital lending framework that could...

Calcutta High Court Quashes GST Proceedings Based Solely on Omitted Rule 96(10)

The Calcutta High Court has quashed a GST show cause notice and the consequential...