CESTAT Remands Customs Refund Claim Where Duty Was Paid Twice Due to Container Off-Loading at Different Port

HomeIndirect TaxesCESTAT Remands Customs Refund Claim Where Duty Was Paid Twice Due to...

CESTAT Remands Customs Refund Claim Where Duty Was Paid Twice Due to Container Off-Loading at Different Port

Indirect Taxes

Published on

19/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

CESTAT Remands Customs Refund Claim Where Duty Was Paid Twice Due to Container Off-Loading at Different Port

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has remanded a customs refund dispute to the adjudicating authority after holding that the claim deserved fresh consideration, as relevant developments occurred after the original rejection of the refund application. The bench of Ajay Sharma (Judicial Member) observed that the removal of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Customs Refund Claim

CESTAT Remands Customs Refund Claim Where Duty Was Paid Twice Due to Container Off-Loading at Different Port

Membership Required

Latest articles

Supreme Court Upholds Separate Pay Treatment for Re-employed CGIT Presiding Officers, Rejects 6th Pay Commission Parity Claim

High Courts Can’t Grant Post-Dismissal Arrest Protection in GST Pre-Arrest Bail Matters; S. 69 Arrest Order Must Be Communicated: Supreme Court

Legality of Gold Confiscation Based on Retracted Statement Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Frames 8 Substantial Questions of Law

GST Bank Attachment Can’t Continue Beyond 1 Year: Delhi High Court

More like this

Supreme Court Upholds Separate Pay Treatment for Re-employed CGIT Presiding Officers, Rejects 6th Pay Commission Parity Claim

High Courts Can’t Grant Post-Dismissal Arrest Protection in GST Pre-Arrest Bail Matters; S. 69 Arrest Order Must Be Communicated: Supreme Court

Legality of Gold Confiscation Based on Retracted Statement Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Frames 8 Substantial Questions of Law

About us

Company

Categories