HomeIndirect TaxesCustoms Duty Demand Based Solely on Third-Party Emails, Retracted Statements Quashed: CESTAT

Customs Duty Demand Based Solely on Third-Party Emails, Retracted Statements Quashed: CESTAT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Ahmedabad, has quashed customs duty demands, penalties and redemption fines imposed on a timber importer and its partner, holding that allegations of undervaluation cannot be sustained solely on the basis of third-party emails and retracted statements without independent corroborative evidence. The Bench of Dr. Ajaya Krishna…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Only Joint/Additional Commissioner Can Decide DGGI Notices, GST Order by Assistant Commissioner Invalid: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has held that only joint/additional commissioners can decide DGGI notices;...

From GST Cancellation to New Company: ED Probe Sought into Alleged Investor Fraud by Siba Shankar Dash and Daughter

A complaint has been filed seeking an investigation by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED)...

Non-Maintenance of Job Work Records Can Trigger GST Demand U/s 74: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the non-maintenance of job work records can...

Under-Declaration of Turnover Justifies Action U/S 74: Madras High Court Upholds GST Demands Based on Seigniorage Fee Data 

The Madras High Court has upheld GST demand orders issued against a mining contractor...

More like this

Only Joint/Additional Commissioner Can Decide DGGI Notices, GST Order by Assistant Commissioner Invalid: Madras HC

The Madras High Court has held that only joint/additional commissioners can decide DGGI notices;...

From GST Cancellation to New Company: ED Probe Sought into Alleged Investor Fraud by Siba Shankar Dash and Daughter

A complaint has been filed seeking an investigation by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED)...

Non-Maintenance of Job Work Records Can Trigger GST Demand U/s 74: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has held that the non-maintenance of job work records can...