Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCustoms Dept Releases Dulquer Salmaan’s Land Rover Defender Under Strict Conditions 

Customs Dept Releases Dulquer Salmaan’s Land Rover Defender Under Strict Conditions 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Following the directions of the Kerala High Court, the Customs Department has released actor Dulquer Salmaan’s Land Rover Defender, which was seized earlier this year as part of Operation Numkhor, a major crackdown on luxury vehicles allegedly imported through tax evasion routes. 

The release, however, comes with stringent conditions, as the investigation into the case remains ongoing.

According to Mathrubhumi, the order for the vehicle’s conditional release was issued by the Additional Commissioner of Customs, following directions from the Kerala High Court, which had instructed Customs authorities to consider Dulquer’s plea and take a decision within a week.

As per the order, Dulquer is prohibited from taking the vehicle outside without obtaining prior approval from the Customs Department. Additionally, he has been directed to make the vehicle available for inspection or inquiry whenever required during the course of the investigation.

The actor had approached the High Court seeking the provisional release of the vehicle, claiming that it was purchased through legitimate means and that he had furnished all documents substantiating the legality of its acquisition. Dulquer reportedly submitted the vehicle’s complete import records, indicating that it was originally brought into India in 2004.

The Land Rover Defender was among several high-end vehicles seized during Operation Numkhor, an enforcement drive launched by Customs to uncover luxury cars imported via Bhutan and other regions by evading customs duties and taxes. The operation has led to the seizure of multiple premium vehicles and is part of a wider probe into illegal vehicle import networks across southern India.

The conditional return of Dulquer’s vehicle marks a significant development in the ongoing investigation, even as Customs officials continue to scrutinize documentation and the trail of imports connected to the case.

Read More: Ill-Advised Detention, Seizure By Customs Officials Brings Disrepute To Nation: Supreme Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...

More like this

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

Can Disputed ITC Claim Amount to “Fraud or Suppression”? Allahabad HC Stays S. 74 Proceedings Against Samsung Display 

The Allahabad High Court has prima facie questioned the Revenue’s attempt to invoke the...

Bombay High Court Questions 6 Month Limit Under GST Notification for S. 16(5) ITC Benefit

The Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court has raised an important question concerning...