HomeIndirect TaxesSIIB-Chennai (Port) Seizes Two Containers Worth Rs. 18.9 Crore For Mis-Declaration Of...

SIIB-Chennai (Port) Seizes Two Containers Worth Rs. 18.9 Crore For Mis-Declaration Of Cosmetics and Toys

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a significant enforcement action, the Special Intelligence and Investigation Branch (SIIB) of Chennai (Port) has seized two containers with an estimated value of ₹18.9 crore. The goods, which were falsely declared as plastic items and photo frames, were found to contain restricted cosmetics and BIS-regulated toys.

According to customs officials, the seized cosmetics fall under the regulatory framework of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, requiring mandatory approvals for import. Meanwhile, the toys are subject to the Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) certification, which ensures compliance with safety and quality norms before entering the Indian market.

Further scrutiny of the consignment has led to the initiation of an Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) verification process concerning the cosmetics. Authorities suspect potential violations of trademark and brand protections, necessitating a detailed examination.

Customs officials stated that the misdeclaration of goods was an attempt to evade regulatory scrutiny and import restrictions. Investigations are underway to trace the importers and assess their compliance history.

This seizure underscores the vigilance of SIIB-Chennai (Port) in preventing unlawful imports and safeguarding consumer interests. The authorities have reiterated their commitment to strict enforcement of trade regulations and intellectual property laws at Indian ports.

Further developments in the investigation are expected as customs officials continue to probe the matter.

Read More: CESTAT Rejects Tech Mahindra’s Refund Claims of Unutilized Cenvat Credit for On-Site Services to Overseas Clients

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Input Services Are Availed Outside Factory Premises: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bengaluru, has held that a...

Can GST Prosecution Continue After Tax Demand Falls Below Rs. 5 Crore? Uttarakhand HC Defers Decision

The Uttarakhand High Court has adjourned sine die a petition challenging criminal prosecution under...

Listed Company Assets Can’t Be Used to Secure Promoters’ Loans: SEBI Imposes Rs. 14.8 Million Penalty On Zee Entertainment 

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has made it clear that promoters...

Separate GST Proceedings for Different FY Not Barred U/s 6(2)(b): Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court's judgment holding...

More like this

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Input Services Are Availed Outside Factory Premises: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bengaluru, has held that a...

Can GST Prosecution Continue After Tax Demand Falls Below Rs. 5 Crore? Uttarakhand HC Defers Decision

The Uttarakhand High Court has adjourned sine die a petition challenging criminal prosecution under...

Listed Company Assets Can’t Be Used to Secure Promoters’ Loans: SEBI Imposes Rs. 14.8 Million Penalty On Zee Entertainment 

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has made it clear that promoters...