HomeIndirect TaxesContractor Can’t Be Penalised for Contractee’s Failure to Deduct Higher VAT TDS...

Contractor Can’t Be Penalised for Contractee’s Failure to Deduct Higher VAT TDS After Rate Hike: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that a contractor cannot be subjected to recovery of differential VAT merely because the contractee failed to deduct tax at the enhanced rate, especially when the contractor has already discharged its full tax liability through regular returns. The Division Bench of Justice Jagmohan Bansal and Justice Amarinder…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

AO Can’t Reject DCF Share Valuation and Substitute NAV Method for Section 56(2)(viib) Addition: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Marriage Gifts and Household Cash Retention Can’t Be Rejected on Mere Suspicion: ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that cash...

ITAT Restores Dawoodi Bohra Jamat’s 12AB Registration Matter

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an...

Donation to Political Party Was Part of Accommodation Entry Scheme: ITAT Upholds Denial of S. 80GGC Deduction

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the disallowance...

More like this

AO Can’t Reject DCF Share Valuation and Substitute NAV Method for Section 56(2)(viib) Addition: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Marriage Gifts and Household Cash Retention Can’t Be Rejected on Mere Suspicion: ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that cash...

ITAT Restores Dawoodi Bohra Jamat’s 12AB Registration Matter

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an...