Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesContractor Can’t Be Penalised for Contractee’s Failure to Deduct Higher VAT TDS...

Contractor Can’t Be Penalised for Contractee’s Failure to Deduct Higher VAT TDS After Rate Hike: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Contractor Can’t Be Penalised for Contractee’s Failure to Deduct Higher VAT TDS After Rate Hike: Punjab & Haryana High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that a contractor cannot be subjected to recovery of differential VAT merely because the contractee failed to deduct tax at the enhanced rate, especially when the contractor has already discharged its full tax liability through regular returns. The Division Bench of Justice Jagmohan Bansal and Justice Amarinder…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

S. 110(5) Customs Act: Patna HC Mandates Pre-Decisional Hearing Before Attachment Extension

The Patna High Court has held that the extension of a provisional bank-account attachment...
Indirect Taxes

CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Rent-a-Cab and Staff Welfare Expenses

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

Delayed Payment Alone Can’t Trigger Higher Duty on All Packing Machines: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench has held that...
Indirect Taxes

One-to-One Input-Export Correlation Not Required: CESTAT Quashes Recovery of Cenvat Refund

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

S. 110(5) Customs Act: Patna HC Mandates Pre-Decisional Hearing Before Attachment Extension

The Patna High Court has held that the extension of a provisional bank-account attachment...
Indirect Taxes

CESTAT Allows CENVAT Credit on Rent-a-Cab and Staff Welfare Expenses

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

Delayed Payment Alone Can’t Trigger Higher Duty on All Packing Machines: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata Bench has held that...