Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesConditions for Provisional Release of Seized Food Imports in Rs. 43 Crore...

Conditions for Provisional Release of Seized Food Imports in Rs. 43 Crore Customs Dispute Eased: Delhi HC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has directed the Customs department to relax stringent conditions imposed on importers for the provisional release of seized imported goods worth over Rs. 43 crore. The seized consignments include perishable food products from the French brand ‘Monin’.

The bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh and Justice Shail Jain have observed that whether there is under-declaration or not is yet to be adjudicated. At this stage, the goods cannot be permitted to be seized perpetually especially, considering that these are perishable goods. The imports themselves may come to a standstill if the conditions are not relaxed.

The petitioner/assessee, M and V Marketing and Sales Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in the import and distribution of globally recognized food and beverage products, has been the authorized importer for the French brand ‘Monin’ in India for several years. The company’s imports typically include flavoured syrups and related products, which are used widely in the hospitality and food service sectors.

Until mid-2025, the firm had reportedly faced no major regulatory or customs disputes. However, in June 2025, the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), Delhi, initiated an investigation into the company’s imports. Acting on the inquiry, the DRI conducted searches and subsequently seized multiple consignments under seizure memos dated July 1, 2025 and July 7, 2025.

The DRI’s investigation centres on allegations of under-declaration of the value of imported goods. Authorities claim that there exists a commercial arrangement between M and V Marketing and Monin India Pvt. Ltd. (a subsidiary of the French brand’s parent company) under which certain payments for marketing and promotional expenses are being made in India. The Customs department argues that these expenses ought to be included in the transaction value of the goods for customs duty purposes. If accepted, this would increase the assessable value and, consequently, the customs duty payable.

On July 22, 2025, when the matter first came up before the Delhi High Court, the petitioner highlighted the perishable nature of the seized goods and sought their urgent provisional release. They pointed out that they had already deposited ₹3.75 crore as a voluntary payment “under protest” and had also filed an application for provisional release.

The Court directed the Customs Department in Mumbai—who were in possession of the seized consignments—to decide on the provisional release application before August 1, 2025. On July 24, 2025, Customs issued a provisional release order, requiring the company to execute a bond for the entire assessable value of Rs. 43.21 crore. Furnish a bank guarantee/security deposit of Rs. 21 crore to cover the estimated differential duty, possible redemption fine, and penalties.

Case Details

Case Title: M And V Marketing And Sales Private Limited Versus Intelligence Officer DRI

Case No.: W.P.(C) 10489/2025 & CM APPL. 48296/2025

Date:   07th August, 2025

Counsel For  Petitioner:  Amar Dave, Sr. Adv.

Counsel For Respondent: Anurag Ojha, SSC

Read More: ICAI Announces Awards for Promotion of Accounting Reforms in Local Bodies for 2025-26

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

PMLA Bail Conditions Can’t Override Right to Liberty Amid Prolonged Trial: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has granted bail to in a money laundering case involving alleged...

Pending Property Dispute Alone Can’t Block Addition Of Godown To GST Registration: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that an...

GST Demand Can’t Rest On E-Way Bill Mismatch When Goods Are Recorded In Books: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that tax...

Wrong CPC Provision Can’t Defeat Third-Party Objection To Property Possession: SC Orders Fresh Inquiry 

The Supreme Court has set aside orders rejecting a charitable Wakf’s objections to the...

More like this

PMLA Bail Conditions Can’t Override Right to Liberty Amid Prolonged Trial: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has granted bail to in a money laundering case involving alleged...

Pending Property Dispute Alone Can’t Block Addition Of Godown To GST Registration: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that an...

GST Demand Can’t Rest On E-Way Bill Mismatch When Goods Are Recorded In Books: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that tax...