Commissioner (Appeals) Can’t Revisit Final Duty Drawback Order After It Attains Finality: Orissa High Court Grants Relief To Vedanta

HomeIndirect TaxesCommissioner (Appeals) Can’t Revisit Final Duty Drawback Order After It Attains Finality:...

Commissioner (Appeals) Can’t Revisit Final Duty Drawback Order After It Attains Finality: Orissa High Court Grants Relief To Vedanta

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

27/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Commissioner (Appeals) Can’t Revisit Final Duty Drawback Order After It Attains Finality: Orissa High Court Grants Relief To Vedanta

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Orissa High Court has quashed a customs appellate order that denied duty drawback to Vedanta Limited and held that once an earlier appellate order granting the benefit had attained finality, it could not be reopened by the Commissioner (Appeal) indirectly through subsequent proceedings. The Bench of Chief Justice Harish Tandon and Justice Murahari Sri…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Duty Drawback

Commissioner (Appeals) Can’t Revisit Final Duty Drawback Order After It Attains Finality: Orissa High Court Grants Relief To Vedanta

Membership Required

Latest articles

Consumer Forum Jurisdiction Barred in Fraud-Linked Banking Disputes; Supreme Court Clarifies Fixed Deposits Not Per Se ‘Commercial Purpose’

AI-Generated Fake Judgments Threat to Judicial Integrity: Supreme Court

Pregnant IRS Officer Prabha Bhandari Moves Supreme Court Against Bail Rejection in CBI Bribery Case; Questions Evidence and “Control Call” Legality

Reassessment Quashed Citing Invalid Sanction from Incompetent Authority Beyond 3 Year Limit: ITAT

More like this

Consumer Forum Jurisdiction Barred in Fraud-Linked Banking Disputes; Supreme Court Clarifies Fixed Deposits Not Per Se ‘Commercial Purpose’

AI-Generated Fake Judgments Threat to Judicial Integrity: Supreme Court

Pregnant IRS Officer Prabha Bhandari Moves Supreme Court Against Bail Rejection in CBI Bribery Case; Questions Evidence and “Control Call” Legality

About us

Company

Categories