Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCESTAT Upholds Service Tax On Legal Fee Expense

CESTAT Upholds Service Tax On Legal Fee Expense

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld the Service Tax amounting to Rs. 31800 on Legal Fee expense incurred by the appellant, Saisun Outsourcing Services during the period F.Y. 2016-17.

The bench of Binu Tamta (Judicial Member) and Hemambika R. Priya Member (Technical) has observed that the appellant has shown Legal fees expense of Rs. 2,12,000/-in 2016-17. No submission was made by the appellant nor have they contested the applicability of Service Tax on the said expense. In absence of any reply or any supporting documents, Legal fees expenses incurred by the appellant are expenses towards Legal services.

The appellant/assessee was registered under Service Tax for providing services under Manpower Recruitment/Supply agency Services. The Commissioner also confirmed the demand of Service Tax of Rs. 31,800 in respect of legal & consultancy services under RCM under proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 along with interest. 

The appellant contended that service tax amounting to Rs. 31800 including Cess in respect of legal & Consultancy services under RCM should not be demanded and recovered from them under provisions of section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994.

The Tribunal while dismissing the appeal, upheld the Service Tax on Legal Fee expense incurred by the assessee.

Case Details

Case Title: Saisun Outsourcing Services Private Limited Versus Commissioner of Central Goods, Service Tax, Jabalpur

Case No.: Service Tax Appeal No. 54991 Of 2023

Date: 04.03.2025

Counsel For Appellant: None

Counsel For Respondent: Manoj Kumar

Read More: GST Dept. Issues Interest Recovery Notices For Delayed Outward Supply Declarations

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

4 Hearing Opportunities By Customs Dept. Satisfy Natural Justice: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging a Customs revisional order...

Consolidated GST SCN Covering Multiple FY Is Not Without Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that the issuance of a consolidated show cause...

Procedural Error in Customs Broker Licence Inquiry Can Be Rectified Through Remand: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that a procedural error committed during proceedings for...

More like this

4 Hearing Opportunities By Customs Dept. Satisfy Natural Justice: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging a Customs revisional order...

Consolidated GST SCN Covering Multiple FY Is Not Without Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that the issuance of a consolidated show cause...

Procedural Error in Customs Broker Licence Inquiry Can Be Rectified Through Remand: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has held that a procedural error committed during proceedings for...